2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2021.111034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inter-rater reliability of the diagnosis of otitis media based on otoscopic images and wideband tympanometry measurements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, each ENT rated their certainty of each diagnosis on the scale: very low, low, medium, moderate, or high, which is converted to a scale from 0 to 1. More details on this dataset are in Sundgaard et al [28]. For a case, μ correct is the fraction of correct ENT answers and μ certainty is the average self-evaluated certainty.…”
Section: Datasetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, each ENT rated their certainty of each diagnosis on the scale: very low, low, medium, moderate, or high, which is converted to a scale from 0 to 1. More details on this dataset are in Sundgaard et al [28]. For a case, μ correct is the fraction of correct ENT answers and μ certainty is the average self-evaluated certainty.…”
Section: Datasetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The multi‐modal model performs better for both classification and difficulty estimation compared to the models trained on the two modalities separately. The four ENTs in the human inter‐rater study by Sundgaard et al 24 achieved 64% accuracy on this dataset based on the same amount of patient information used in the multi‐modal embedding model, which achieved 86%. This substantial increase in performance is very promising for a future diagnostic tool and shows the strength of deep learning models for medical image analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…More details on the human inter‐rater study with the four ENTs can be found in Sundgaard et al 24 The ground truth diagnosis used for training the models for this paper is based solely on the diagnosis by the original ENT, who assessed the patients in the clinic. There is, of course, a risk of human errors in the annotation process, but no other solution for achieving a ground truth diagnosis was possible in the current study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Due to the VA enlargement, the volume of the inner ear increases. This reduces the conduction of high-frequency sound ( Sundgaard et al, 2022 ), i.e., a decline in absorbance, suggesting that an increased inner ear volume should be part of the mass in the whole sound transmission system. From the audiology perspective, LVAS often manifests as characteristic low-frequency air-bone conduction differences, but no reports are available on air-bone conduction differences in patients with high-frequency residual hearing, probably suggesting a difference in the absorbance of low-frequency and high-frequency sounds.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%