Inter‐rater reliability of the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale and the Groningen Social Disabilities Schedule in a European multi‐site randomized controlled trial on the effectiveness of acute psychiatric day hospitals

Abstract

The objectives of this study were to report the inter-rater reliability of the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS 4.0) and the Groningen Social Disabilities Schedule (GSDS-II) as assessed in a randomized controlled trial on the effectiveness of psychiatric day hospitals spanning five sites in countries of Central and Western Europe. Following brief training sessions, videotaped BPRS-interviews and written GSDS-vignettes were rated by clinically experienced researchers from all participating sites. Inter-rater reliability often proved to be poor for items assessing the severity of both psychopathology and social dysfunction, but findings suggest that both instruments allow for the assessment of the presence or absence of specific psychopathological symptoms or social disabilities. Inter-rater reliability at subscale level proved to be good for both instruments. Results indicate that, with a brief training session and proper use of the instruments, psychopathology and social disabilities can be reliably assessed within cross-national research studies. The results are of particular interest given that the need to conduct cross-national multi-site studies including countries with different cultural backgrounds increases.

Client Predictors of Employment Outcomes in High-Fidelity Supported Employment

“…Each item is rated on a 7-point scale ranging from 1 ("not present") to 7 ("extremely severe"). The BPRS-E has good interrater reliability (Addington and Addington, 1993;Schutzwohl et al, 2003). The Hartford and Chicago studies measured symptoms over the past 2 weeks using the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS: Kay et al, 1987), a 30-item, 7-point rating scale completed by clinically trained research staff at the conclusion of chart review and a semi-structured interview.…”

Are Day Hospitals Effective for Acutely Ill Psychiatric Patients?

“…Translation and specific training procedures, along with results of a BPRS rater training (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] = .78), are reported elsewhere. 20 Treatment satisfaction was assessed at admission and discharge using the Client Assessment of Treatment. The questionnaire comprises seven 11-point visual analogue rating scales assessing, for example, general satisfaction, medication, other therapeutic activities, and staff behavior.…”

Dimensionale Diagnostik mit der deutschsprachigen Version der Schedules for Clinical Assessment in Neuropsychiatry 2.1

“…Die Patienten wurden innerhalb von 3 Tagen nach Behandlungsbeginn von klinisch erfahrenen und SCAN-trainierten Interviewern befragt [12]. Erhoben wurde die Symptombelastung im Monat vor dem Untersuchungszeitpunkt.…”