2007
DOI: 10.1007/s10488-007-0134-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inter-rater Reliability of Clinician-rated Outcome Measures in Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services

Abstract: This study investigated the inter-rater reliability when 169 out of 171 clinicians working in 10 Norwegian child and adolescent mental health services rated 20 written vignettes using the following outcome measures: Health of the Nation Outcome Scales for Children and Adolescents (HoNOSCA), Children's Global Assessment Scale (CGAS) and Global Assessment of Psychosocial Disability (GAPD). Three clinicians rated both patients and vignettes. On vignettes the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for the HoNOSC… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
40
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
5
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We did not measure the interrater reliability of the CGAS for this study. However, the interrater reliability of the CGAS in routine use was found to be moderate (intraclass correlation coefficient, .61) in a large study of clinicians in Norwegian outpatient child and adolescent mental health services [25]. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We did not measure the interrater reliability of the CGAS for this study. However, the interrater reliability of the CGAS in routine use was found to be moderate (intraclass correlation coefficient, .61) in a large study of clinicians in Norwegian outpatient child and adolescent mental health services [25]. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interrater reliability, discriminant validity, and clinical usefulness of the CGAS are well documented [35,36]. Scores greater than 70 are designated as indicating normal function [34].…”
Section: Psychosocial Functioningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CGAS is a widely used measure, shown to have high inter-rater reliability, with intra-class correlations (ICCs) of .84 between clinicians' initial ratings, and excellent test-retest stability with ICCs of .85 between raters 6 months after initial ratings (Shaffer et al, 1983). More modest ICCs of .73 and .61 were found with larger samples (Hanssen-Bauer, Aalen, Ruud, & Heyerdahl, 2007;Lundh, Kowalski, Sundberg, Gumpert, & Landén, 2010). CGAS is sensitive to 'differences in level of impairment', with the tool yielding statistically significant differences between outpatient and inpatient scores (Shaffer et al, 1983).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%