2020
DOI: 10.47066/2177-9333.ac.2019.0002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inter-rater and test-retest reliabilities of the Glittre-ADL test in healthy subjects

Abstract: Introdução: O teste de AVD-Glittre (TGlittre) é válido para avaliar a capacidade funcional. Entretanto, poucos estudos verificaram suas propriedades de medida. Objetivo: Avaliar a confiabilidade interavaliador e testereteste do TGlittre em indivíduos saudáveis. Métodos: Treze indivíduos saudáveis (8 mulheres; 27,3 ± 3,94 anos) tiveram seu histórico de saúde, atividade física, antropometria e capacidade funcional avaliados. No primeiro dia, o TGlittre foi realizado duas vezes, randomizadamente, por dois avaliad… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 36 , 37 The TGlittre also proved to be reliable in other populations, with ICCs ranging between 0.84 and 0.93. 16 , 18 , 19 , 38 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“… 36 , 37 The TGlittre also proved to be reliable in other populations, with ICCs ranging between 0.84 and 0.93. 16 , 18 , 19 , 38 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…36,37 The TGlittre also proved to be reliable in other populations, with ICCs ranging between 0.84 and 0.93. 16,18,19,38 Given the scarcity of standardized tests, no "gold standard" field test is present for the functional evaluation of ILD patients. Among the most used, the 6MWT is the one that best reflects the everyday life of this population, being highly standardized in chronic respiratory diseases (ICC of 0.82 to 0.99) 31 and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (ICC of 0.82), 7 values similar to those of the TGlittre.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 ) was performed as previously proposed by Skumlien et al (2006) . This test showed excellent validity and reliability in different populations with the most varied clinical conditions ( Corrêa et al, 2011 ; José and Dal Corso, 2015 ; Montemezzo et al, 2019 ; Reis et al, 2018 ; Skumlien et al, 2006 ). It consists of carrying a backpack weighing 2.5 kg for women on their backs and running a circuit with a length of 10 m. In it, the individual, from the sitting position, walks on a flat path interposed in its half by a box with two steps to go up and two to go down (17 cm high X 27 cm long).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 98%