1994
DOI: 10.3109/09638289409166014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inter-rater agreement of two functional independence scales: The Functional Independence Measure (FIM) and a subjective uniform continuous scale

Abstract: The needs and clinical decisions of care centres are related to patients' ability to carry out daily living activities. Most of the functional scales are not easy to use. This study examined the inter-rater agreement of the Functional Independence Measure (FIM) and a subjective uniform continuous scale (UCS) (the rating varied between 0 = complete dependence and 9 = complete independence) between 'educators', physiotherapists and occupational therapists. Two hundred and fifty-four patients aged below 20 in a r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
25
0
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
3
25
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The FIM SM has been used as a measure of functional ability in numerous studies that span various populations and data support the measure has adequate validity and reliability (Chau, Daler, & Andre, 1994;Dodds, Martin, Stolov, & Deyo, 1993;Granger, Cotter, Hamilton, & Granger, 1993). The instrument contains 13 items that address motor function (eating, grooming, bathing, dressing, toileting, bowel and bladder control, transfers, and locomotion) and 5 items that measure cognitive function (communication and social cognition).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The FIM SM has been used as a measure of functional ability in numerous studies that span various populations and data support the measure has adequate validity and reliability (Chau, Daler, & Andre, 1994;Dodds, Martin, Stolov, & Deyo, 1993;Granger, Cotter, Hamilton, & Granger, 1993). The instrument contains 13 items that address motor function (eating, grooming, bathing, dressing, toileting, bowel and bladder control, transfers, and locomotion) and 5 items that measure cognitive function (communication and social cognition).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…32 Each item is rated with a score from 1 to 7, for a maximum score of 126: 1 = complete assistance to perform basic activities of daily living; 2 = maximal assistance; 3 = moderate assistance; 4 = minimal assistance; 5 = supervision; 6 = modified independence; and 7 = complete independence in performing basic daily living. The FIM has established good interrater reliability, construct validity, 33,34 and discriminate validity. 35 We also used the Motor Activity Log (MAL), a semistructured interview of patients, to assess the amount of use (AOU) and quality of movement (QOM) of the affected UE in 30 important daily activities using a 6-point ordinal scale.…”
Section: Outcome Measuresmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The occupational therapist used the FIM™ (Uniform Data System for Medical Rehabilitation, 1997) to measure the amount of assistance needed from a helper for self-care, mobility, and social cognition activities. The FIM has been shown to have excellent validity (Corrigan, SmithKnapp, & Granger, 1997) and reliability (Chau, Daler, Andre, & Patris, 1994). Helen received a score of 1 (total assistance) on most of the FIM items evaluated by the occupational therapist.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%