2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.nicl.2019.101727
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inter-rater agreement in glioma segmentations on longitudinal MRI

Abstract: Background Tumor segmentation of glioma on MRI is a technique to monitor, quantify and report disease progression. Manual MRI segmentation is the gold standard but very labor intensive. At present the quality of this gold standard is not known for different stages of the disease, and prior work has mainly focused on treatment-naive glioblastoma. In this paper we studied the inter-rater agreement of manual MRI segmentation of glioblastoma and WHO grade II-III glioma for novices and experts at three… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
78
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
7
78
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Fifth, we did not calculate Jaccard/Dice overlap scores between the two observers (EH and PW). The interrater agreement for tumor segmentation before surgery in general is known to be non-trivial [49].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fifth, we did not calculate Jaccard/Dice overlap scores between the two observers (EH and PW). The interrater agreement for tumor segmentation before surgery in general is known to be non-trivial [49].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, it is worth mentioning that this experiment sheds only some light on the effectiveness of applying the deep models (or other data-driven techniques) trained over BraTS for analyzing different MRI brain images. The manual delineation protocols were different, and the lack of inter-rater agreement may play pivotal role in quantifying automated segmentation algorithms over such differently acquired and analyzed image sets-it is unclear if the differences result from the inter-rater disagreement of the incorrect segmentation (Hollingworth et al, 2006;Fyllingen et al, 2016;Visser et al, 2019).…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All patients with at least a preoperative postcontrast T1-weighted scan were included, and no patients were excluded. These data were collected as part of the PICTURE project (https://www.pictureproject.nl) (7,9,(21)(22)(23). The histopathologic diagnosis was determined according to the World Health Organization 2007 criteria (24).…”
Section: Clinical Patient Datasetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each model is described by the abbreviation of the included data, preceded with a "c" if only patients with complete imaging were included, and followed by "st" if sparsified training was enabled. The 20 test patients from hospital 1 were previously studied in Visser et al (9). hospital 6.…”
Section: Experimental Designmentioning
confidence: 99%