2011
DOI: 10.1080/13662716.2011.591966
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inter-Organizational Network Studies—A Literature Review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
85
0
7

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 113 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
1
85
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Analytical studies acknowledge specific social structures between nodes and tend to measure these formally. In analytical studies, it is possible to use social network analysis, making these comparable and specific in terms of network structure (Bergenholtz and Waldstrøm 2011).…”
Section: Concepts and Definitionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analytical studies acknowledge specific social structures between nodes and tend to measure these formally. In analytical studies, it is possible to use social network analysis, making these comparable and specific in terms of network structure (Bergenholtz and Waldstrøm 2011).…”
Section: Concepts and Definitionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In an effort to reify an understanding of the nature of knowledge flow, and perhaps better align knowledge spillover and cumulative causation theories of growth, the role of inter-organisational networks as facilitators of knowledge flow has increasingly come to prominence across the economics, geography and management fields (Zucker et al, 2007;Tappeiner et al, 2008;Maggioni and Uberti, 2009;Bergenholtz and Waldstrøm, 2011;Colombo et al, 2011). Inter-organisational networks in this sense are defined as consisting of the interactions and relationships organisations (principally firms) utilise to access knowledge beyond their market relationships.…”
Section: Inter-organisational Network and Knowledge Flowmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This understanding remains limited because of the plethora of cross-sectional studies in the field (Bergenholtz & Waldstrøm, 2011;Bowen et al, 2010;Lööf & Heshmati, 2006). Study Two also supports the evolutionary economic argument that innovation provides only temporary advantages (Nelson & Winter, 1982a) in that SMEs need to continually innovate to counteract the diminishing performance returns from moderate levels of innovation breadth over time.…”
Section: Summary Of Main Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…The innovation breadth construct, that is integral to the research models of the last three studies comprising this thesis, is a novel concept and a valuable methodological contribution to innovation studies. Fourth, network and social capital theories are informed by confirming the linkage between networks, innovation breadth and SME performance within a longitudinal design, an understanding that remains limited due to the plethora of cross-sectional studies in the field (Bergenholtz & Waldstrøm, 2011;Bowen, Rostami & Steel, 2010;Lööf & Heshmati, 2006). Evolutionary economics is also enhanced in confirming that innovation advantages are temporary (Nelson & Winter, 1982a) and that SMEs should continually innovate to maintain higher performance levels.…”
Section: Studies Two and Three Use Quantitative Analysis Obtained Fromentioning
confidence: 99%