Abstract:T he learning process between supply chain entities is explored from the perspective of senior third-party executives. Through grounded theory, a theoretical framework emerged that extends our understanding of learning within a supply chain by identifying the major constructs and learning stages comprising the basic social process of inter-organizational learning. This framework provides significant insights into the complex process employed in a supply chain to share, disseminate, and store information; co-cr… Show more
“…We also observed "interorganizational learning" taking place throughout the innovation process. This observation is consistent with the finding of Manuj et al (2014), Su et al (2011), andLee et al (2011) on the need to include not only customers but also other stakeholders such as suppliers in the logistics innovation process. The antecedents of logistics innovation identified by Grawe (2009) in a systematic review of logistics journals were also found in the case of On-site Shop.…”
Section: Implications For Theorysupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Moreover, the centralized organization played a central role for “interorganizational learning” (Manuj et al. ) from the beginning of the innovation process.…”
Section: Generative Mechanisms Of Observed Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This solution provides management resources for conducting "setting the stage activities" proposed in the logistics innovation process model of Flint et al (2005). Moreover, the centralized organization played a central role for "interorganizational learning" (Manuj et al 2014) from the beginning of the innovation process.…”
Section: Intended Outcomes: Generative Mechanisms That Explain Repeatmentioning
E mpirical studies of logistics innovations have focused on the innovation process, bypassing much the innovative artifact or solution design itself. Focusing on the artifact and solution design in a case study, we contribute to the emerging theory of logistics innovations through articulating the generative mechanisms of the adoption of logistics innovation, that is, the mechanisms through which the design of the solution enables its adoption. We study On-site Shop, a rare example from the construction industry of a logistics innovation that has successfully migrated from a limited number of pilots to common practice. The case study is based on insights from participation in the design of the solution, and on 55 interviews conducted in a relationship triad consisting of three groups: (1) construction site users, (2) the solution designers, and (3) the suppliers. We propose that standard and efficient solution set-up is the key enabler of logistics innovation's adoption at temporary construction sites. Communication and operating rules facilitate adoption in the triad, whereas internal and external integration further advance adoption by creating links between the innovative logistics solution and other activities. Finally, trilateral collaboration and congruent technological frames in the relationship triad sustain adoption over time.
“…We also observed "interorganizational learning" taking place throughout the innovation process. This observation is consistent with the finding of Manuj et al (2014), Su et al (2011), andLee et al (2011) on the need to include not only customers but also other stakeholders such as suppliers in the logistics innovation process. The antecedents of logistics innovation identified by Grawe (2009) in a systematic review of logistics journals were also found in the case of On-site Shop.…”
Section: Implications For Theorysupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Moreover, the centralized organization played a central role for “interorganizational learning” (Manuj et al. ) from the beginning of the innovation process.…”
Section: Generative Mechanisms Of Observed Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This solution provides management resources for conducting "setting the stage activities" proposed in the logistics innovation process model of Flint et al (2005). Moreover, the centralized organization played a central role for "interorganizational learning" (Manuj et al 2014) from the beginning of the innovation process.…”
Section: Intended Outcomes: Generative Mechanisms That Explain Repeatmentioning
E mpirical studies of logistics innovations have focused on the innovation process, bypassing much the innovative artifact or solution design itself. Focusing on the artifact and solution design in a case study, we contribute to the emerging theory of logistics innovations through articulating the generative mechanisms of the adoption of logistics innovation, that is, the mechanisms through which the design of the solution enables its adoption. We study On-site Shop, a rare example from the construction industry of a logistics innovation that has successfully migrated from a limited number of pilots to common practice. The case study is based on insights from participation in the design of the solution, and on 55 interviews conducted in a relationship triad consisting of three groups: (1) construction site users, (2) the solution designers, and (3) the suppliers. We propose that standard and efficient solution set-up is the key enabler of logistics innovation's adoption at temporary construction sites. Communication and operating rules facilitate adoption in the triad, whereas internal and external integration further advance adoption by creating links between the innovative logistics solution and other activities. Finally, trilateral collaboration and congruent technological frames in the relationship triad sustain adoption over time.
“…; Manuj et al. ). The interviews, which were conducted over a six‐month period, lasted from 40 and 60 min; interviews were audiotaped and transcribed verbatim.…”
Section: Study 1: Inductively Framing the Researchmentioning
A recent Deloitte study of 600 Supply Chain and C‐Level executives revealed that 45% felt that their supply chain risk management programs were only somewhat effective or not effective at all, while a mere 33% used risk management approaches to proactively and strategically manage supply chain risk based on conditions in their operating environment. Using a two‐method approach, the research summarized in this paper investigates the effectiveness of different supply chain risk management approaches by examining how performance varies when these approaches are applied under different risk conditions. The results counter prevailing knowledge regarding the appropriate use of such widely acknowledged risk management approaches as postponement and speculation, and highlight the dangers of functionally isolated decision making. The results lend credence to increasing calls for interdisciplinary research to address broad‐based supply and demand chain problems, and support the need to utilize performance metrics such as net profit to accurately assess supply chain decisions.
“…This pattern reflects the need for organizational capacity to process substantial volumes of information with high levels of ambiguity. The knowledge-based view (e.g., Grant 1996) and organizational learning (Levinthal and March 1993;Manuj et al 2014) identify knowledge as a critical resource that is created and dispersed across individuals in an organization. An important organizational task is to integrate individuals' existing specialized knowledge in ways that foster the development of new knowledge (Grant 1996;Zollo and Winter 2002).…”
Section: Theoretical Interpretation Of Links Between Integration Requmentioning
In response to globalization, diversification, and other organizational drivers, managers continue to seek organizational designs that promote integration. We study this phenomenon by focusing on requirements and mechanisms for internal supply chain integration (SCI). Using qualitative interview data, we examine how managers in manufacturing firms integrate internal supply chain activities. We elaborate and extend the information processing view by studying why organizations integrate (integration requirements) and how integration mechanisms are associated with different integration requirements. Four patterns of integration requirement–mechanism linkages emerged from our study, depicting integration mechanisms that are associated with a particular integration requirement, and those that are not. We provide a detailed examination of the multidimensional nature of integration requirements, as well as an increased understanding of how integration mechanisms are used to manage different integration requirements. These findings offer deeper insights into organizational integration, enhancing the understanding of integration in the context of internal supply chains, while also contributing to the literature on organizational design. For supply chain managers, these findings describe ways in which organizational design decisions can support internal SCI efforts with varying aims.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.