2016
DOI: 10.1089/thy.2015.0508
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inter-Observer Variation in the Pathologic Identification of Minimal Extrathyroidal Extension in Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

2
26
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is most likely explained by the fact that patients who harboured PTC with minimal extrathyroidal extension and who were explicitly categorized in previous editions as having T3 tumours are no longer identified as such in the eighth edition. However, overall agreement on the identification and pathological reporting of minimal extrathyroidal extension is poor, and there are conflicting results from other studies on the prognostic relevance of minimal extrathyroidal extension. Analysis of data concerning the potential relevance of minimal extrathyroidal extension to patient outcomes should continue.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…This is most likely explained by the fact that patients who harboured PTC with minimal extrathyroidal extension and who were explicitly categorized in previous editions as having T3 tumours are no longer identified as such in the eighth edition. However, overall agreement on the identification and pathological reporting of minimal extrathyroidal extension is poor, and there are conflicting results from other studies on the prognostic relevance of minimal extrathyroidal extension. Analysis of data concerning the potential relevance of minimal extrathyroidal extension to patient outcomes should continue.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…While there is still considerable interobserver variability about the detection of extrathyroidal extension [55], it seems that most pathologists use histologic features of tumor involving fat, skeletal muscle, nerve, and thickwalled vessels as major criteria to represent microscopic extrathyroidal extension [55], and thus similar criteria were employed here. In the present series, the majority of cases were staged group I (68 %) with the remainder, when using soft tissue extension criteria, group III (32 %).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is important to emphasize that micro‐PTCs in this study were not incidental “occult” tumors just because they were detected by ultrasound in asymptomatic patients. The high rates of extrathyroidal extension to the fat and connective tissue and nodal disease attest to the justified treatment tactics that included surgery in view of the patients’ young age and the risk of rapid progression of tumors with such invasive characteristics …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The high rates of extrathyroidal extension to the fat and connective tissue and nodal disease attest to the justified treatment tactics that included surgery in view of the patients' young age and the risk of rapid progression of tumors with such invasive characteristics. [30][31][32][33] It should be noted that in 2017, the criteria for ascribing welldifferentiated thyroid carcinomas pT3 category were revised in the 8th edition of the TNM classification. 34 According to this classification, tumors larger than 40 mm confined to the thyroid belong to the PTCs would migrate from the pT3 to pT1a, pT1b, and pT2 categories.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%