2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2011.07.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inter-model consistency and complementarity: Learning from ex-vivo imaging and electrophysiological data towards an integrated understanding of cardiac physiology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We evaluated LBM-EP performance in a dataset distributed during CESC'10 MICCAI Grand Challenge with respect to FEM-EP and to a recently published benchmark [1]. Our purpose being evaluation and not personalization, we did not adjust the parameters locally.…”
Section: Comparison With Published Results On Cesc'10 Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We evaluated LBM-EP performance in a dataset distributed during CESC'10 MICCAI Grand Challenge with respect to FEM-EP and to a recently published benchmark [1]. Our purpose being evaluation and not personalization, we did not adjust the parameters locally.…”
Section: Comparison With Published Results On Cesc'10 Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our purpose being evaluation and not personalization, we did not adjust the parameters locally. We thus compared our results with the generic benchmark of the ionic ten Tusscher-Panfilov model only [1]. CESC'10 dataset consisted in an explanted porcine heart, and comprised optical fluorescence images of transmembrane potential and high-resolution diffusion-weighted (DW) MRI images ( [7]).…”
Section: Comparison With Published Results On Cesc'10 Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Please see also related communications in this issue by Aguado-Sierra et al (2011) andCamara et al (2011).…”
Section: Editor's Notementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, clinical measurements from humans are often incomplete and sparse, then not quite appropriate for exhaustive validation and verification of the electromechanical solvers. More controlled gold-standard electrophysiological data, derived either synthetically [4] or with experimental models [5], has been used in some simulation benchmarks to verify, customize, validate and integrate different cardiac electrophysiological solvers. A challenge organized in STACOM'11 aiming at validating myocardial tracking and deformation algorithms applied to image sequences [6], but, to our knowledge, there has not been yet a challenge for assessing simulated deformation fields provided by electromechanical models of the heart.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%