2014
DOI: 10.1088/0029-5515/54/8/083027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inter-machine comparison of the termination phase and energy conversion in tokamak disruptions with runaway current plateau formation and implications for ITER

Abstract: The termination of the current and the loss of runaway electrons following runaway current plateau formation during disruptions have been investigated in the JET, DIII-D and FTU tokamaks. Substantial conversion of magnetic energy into runaway kinetic energy, up to ~10 times the initial plateau runaway kinetic energy, has been inferred for the slowest current terminations. Both, modelling and experiment suggest that, in present devices, the efficiency of conversion into runaway kinetic energy is determined to a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
63
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
1
63
0
Order By: Relevance
“…No discussion has been made of the mechanisms driving the runaway seed or the termination phase of the disruption, when the plasma current and the runaway electrons are lost, and conversion of the magnetic energy of the runaway plasma into runaway kinetic energy can occur, determining the final runaway heat loads onto the plasma facing components. 26 These have been evaluated for ITER disruptions with the models presented here in Ref. 27 and will be the subject of a detailed analysis in a future publication.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No discussion has been made of the mechanisms driving the runaway seed or the termination phase of the disruption, when the plasma current and the runaway electrons are lost, and conversion of the magnetic energy of the runaway plasma into runaway kinetic energy can occur, determining the final runaway heat loads onto the plasma facing components. 26 These have been evaluated for ITER disruptions with the models presented here in Ref. 27 and will be the subject of a detailed analysis in a future publication.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A 0D coupled-circuit modeling indicates that longer RE loss times at the wall will cause greater conversion of magnetic to kinetic energy, while fast loss τ Loss < τ W all , τ Ω (where τ Ω is the background plasma resistive time scale) will result in the RE current dominantly being converted into Ohmic current and vessel current [269]. This overall trend was confirmed with comparison to JET, DIII-D, and FTU data [269]. It is essential that the RE plateau current can be converted into wall current (and then dissipated resistively in the wall) for sufficiently fast loss.…”
Section: H Re Energy Deposition Into the Wallmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Depending on the timescale of the runaway loss, a significant fraction of this magnetic energy can be converted into kinetic energy as shown in Fig. 3a [17,18].…”
Section: Thermal Loadsmentioning
confidence: 99%