2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.08.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inter-individual differences in the experience of negative emotion predict variations in functional brain architecture

Abstract: Current evidence suggests that two spatially distinct neuroanatomical networks, the dorsal attention network (DAN) and the default mode network (DMN), support externally and internally oriented cognition, respectively, and are functionally regulated by a third, frontoparietal control network (FPC). Interactions among these networks contribute to normal variations in cognitive functioning and to the aberrant affective profiles present in certain clinical conditions, such as major depression. Nevertheless, their… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 104 publications
(96 reference statements)
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, caution is warranted in generalizing our findings of group differences in Hb connectivity, based on healthy subjects with low or high subclinical depression scores, to clinical populations with MDD or other psychiatric disorders, particularly given the lack of multiple comparison correction for these results. We note, however, that several similar studies have emerged examining possible clinical implications of the HCP dataset [Baroni and Castellanos, ; Pagliaccio et al, ], including a recent resting‐state functional connectivity analysis describing the impact of subclinical depressive symptoms on large‐scale cortical networks [Petrican et al, ]. Such work reflects the growing recognition that psychiatric symptomatology occurs on a continuum and can be found to varying degrees in the general population, with individuals who meet diagnostic criteria representing the upper tail of this distribution [NIMH Strategic Plan, ; Morris and Cuthbert, ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, caution is warranted in generalizing our findings of group differences in Hb connectivity, based on healthy subjects with low or high subclinical depression scores, to clinical populations with MDD or other psychiatric disorders, particularly given the lack of multiple comparison correction for these results. We note, however, that several similar studies have emerged examining possible clinical implications of the HCP dataset [Baroni and Castellanos, ; Pagliaccio et al, ], including a recent resting‐state functional connectivity analysis describing the impact of subclinical depressive symptoms on large‐scale cortical networks [Petrican et al, ]. Such work reflects the growing recognition that psychiatric symptomatology occurs on a continuum and can be found to varying degrees in the general population, with individuals who meet diagnostic criteria representing the upper tail of this distribution [NIMH Strategic Plan, ; Morris and Cuthbert, ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, the DMN has been suggested to support a baseline state of brain activity and be involved in rudimentary functions (Raichle et al, 2001;Shirer et al, 2012). Distinct affective states and subclinical mood symptoms appear to have dissociable neural signatures, and there may exist a symbiotic relationship between cognitive processes and emotional states (Petrican et al, 2015). On the other hand, depressed people have altered DMN patterns during implicit emotional processing, suggesting a link between DMN FC and impaired abilities to regulate emotions in clinical populations (Shi et al, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our study also provided novel insights into the adverse functional implications linked to brain-environment entrainment with respect to momentary featural fluctuations. Prior evidence indicates that anxiety and depression are associated with divergent processing biases (i.e., preferential reliance on perceptual versus abstract information), which impact event perception and segmentation (Belzung et al, 2015;Brewin et al, 2010;Petrican et al, 2015;Sherrill et al, 2019). Accordingly, we find that subclinical anxiety is linked to increased brain-environment alignment, compatible with an attentional bias towards lower level featural information ( Figure 9-a, b), while an opposite tendency, consistent with attentional disengagement from concrete object representations in the here-and-now, is observed for subclinical depression (Figure 9-e).…”
Section: Brain-environment Alignment 13mentioning
confidence: 99%