2019
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-42798-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inter-generational resemblance of methylation levels at circadian genes and associations with phenology in the barn swallow

Abstract: Regulation of gene expression can occur via epigenetic effects as mediated by DNA methylation. The potential for epigenetic effects to be transmitted across generations, thus modulating phenotypic variation and affecting ecological and evolutionary processes, is increasingly appreciated. However, the study of variation in epigenomes and inter-generational transmission of epigenetic alterations in wild populations is at its very infancy. We studied sex- and age-related variation in DNA methylation and parent-of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
(96 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In birds, different associations (negative, positive or no correlation) in different populations, species and candidate genes are often reported (Table S1). Furthermore, few studies have considered candidate gene–environment interactions (but see Bourret & Garant, 2015; Liedvogel & Sheldon, 2010; Liedvogel et al, 2009) or methylation patterns that have been found to explain diverse complex behaviours in birds (Saino et al, 2019). The lack of replicability even within the same species could also be a product of sampling in different locations with a low number of individuals leading to a lack of statistical power, choosing different variables and proxies to measure migration and dispersiveness, using different methodologies to analyse data, publication bias or a combination of all of these (Yang et al, 2022).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In birds, different associations (negative, positive or no correlation) in different populations, species and candidate genes are often reported (Table S1). Furthermore, few studies have considered candidate gene–environment interactions (but see Bourret & Garant, 2015; Liedvogel & Sheldon, 2010; Liedvogel et al, 2009) or methylation patterns that have been found to explain diverse complex behaviours in birds (Saino et al, 2019). The lack of replicability even within the same species could also be a product of sampling in different locations with a low number of individuals leading to a lack of statistical power, choosing different variables and proxies to measure migration and dispersiveness, using different methodologies to analyse data, publication bias or a combination of all of these (Yang et al, 2022).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Firstly, it assumes equal bi‐allelic expression from a single locus, an absence of parental imprinting (Jang et al ., 2013), and identical regulation of both alleles. This contradicts the central hypothesis of altered entrainment cycles in the presence of a length polymorphism as well as some existing evidence for heritable patterns of methylation in birds (Romano et al ., 2017; Saino et al ., 2019). Secondly it assumes knowledge of the copy number variation for the studied genes (Skinner et al ., 2014), which may be particularly complex in birds given that different karyotypes where chromosome numbers ranging between 78 and 82 can be found in most species (Degrandi et al ., 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In birds, different associations (negative, positive or no correlation) in different populations, species and candidate genes are often reported (Table S1). Furthermore, few studies have considered candidate geneenvironment interactions (but see Liedvogel et al, 2009; Liedvogel and Sheldon, 2010; Bourret and Garant, 2015) or methylation patterns that have been found to explain diverse complex behaviours in birds (Saino et al, 2019). The lack of replicability even within the same species could also be a product of sampling in different locations with a low number of individuals leading to a lack of statistical power, choosing different variables and proxies to measure migration and dispersiveness, using different methodologies to analyse data, publication bias or a combination of all of these (Yang et al, 2022).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%