“…Supply chain visibility has been noted as an important organizational capability (see Barratt and Oke, 2007; Juttner and Maklan, 2011;Brandon-Jones et al 2014). It may improve coordination between supply chain partners (Arshinder et al 2008;Carter and Rogers, 2008;Kannan et al 2014;Lehoux et al 2014;Maghsoudi and Pazirandeh, 2016;Akhavan and Beckmann, 2017), information sharing (Mabert and Venkataramanan, 1998) and performance, by reducing the negative consequences of distortions . Furthermore, supply chain visibility allows organizations to be more agile (Christopher, 2000) and creates strategic value (Wei and Wang, 2010).…”
Understanding supply chain sustainability performance is increasingly important for supply chain researchers and managers. Literature has considered supply chain sustainability and the antecedents of performance from a triple bottom line (economic, social, and environmental) perspective. However, the role of supply chain visibility and product complexity contingency in achieving sustainable supply chain performance has not been explored in depth. To address this gap, this study utilizes a contingent resource-based view theory perspective to understand the role of product complexity in shaping the relationship between upstream supply chain visibility (resources and capabilities) and the social, environmental, and economic performance dimensions.We develop and test a theoretical model using survey data gathered from 312 Indian manufacturing organizations. Our findings indicate that supply chain visibility (SCV) has significant influence on social and environmental performance under the moderation effect of product complexity. Hence, the study makes significant contribution to the extant literature by examining the impact of SCV under moderating effect of product complexity on social performance and environmental performance.
“…Supply chain visibility has been noted as an important organizational capability (see Barratt and Oke, 2007; Juttner and Maklan, 2011;Brandon-Jones et al 2014). It may improve coordination between supply chain partners (Arshinder et al 2008;Carter and Rogers, 2008;Kannan et al 2014;Lehoux et al 2014;Maghsoudi and Pazirandeh, 2016;Akhavan and Beckmann, 2017), information sharing (Mabert and Venkataramanan, 1998) and performance, by reducing the negative consequences of distortions . Furthermore, supply chain visibility allows organizations to be more agile (Christopher, 2000) and creates strategic value (Wei and Wang, 2010).…”
Understanding supply chain sustainability performance is increasingly important for supply chain researchers and managers. Literature has considered supply chain sustainability and the antecedents of performance from a triple bottom line (economic, social, and environmental) perspective. However, the role of supply chain visibility and product complexity contingency in achieving sustainable supply chain performance has not been explored in depth. To address this gap, this study utilizes a contingent resource-based view theory perspective to understand the role of product complexity in shaping the relationship between upstream supply chain visibility (resources and capabilities) and the social, environmental, and economic performance dimensions.We develop and test a theoretical model using survey data gathered from 312 Indian manufacturing organizations. Our findings indicate that supply chain visibility (SCV) has significant influence on social and environmental performance under the moderation effect of product complexity. Hence, the study makes significant contribution to the extant literature by examining the impact of SCV under moderating effect of product complexity on social performance and environmental performance.
“…Los incentivos o mecanismos deben influir en las decisiones de los agentes independientes para evitar comportamientos oportunistas o aportes de informaciones falsas que no permitan el correcto reparto de los beneficios generados por la colaboración (Lehoux et al, 2014). Por lo tanto, deben desarrollar la confianza para construir la colaboración y que su mejoras locales en costes o en beneficios repercutan en una mejora global de la cadena de suministro.…”
Section: Antecedentes Para La Revisión Sobre Mecanismos De Coordinaciónunclassified
“…Avlonitis and Karayanni 2000;Hill and Scudder, 2002;Devaraj et al, 2007;Rai et al, 2006). For example, cooperative and collaborative efforts (through a high level of information exchange enabled by Web technologies and portals for customers and suppliers) between supply chain partners have been suggested as critical to improved coordination of allocated resources and activities across the chain (Lee et al, 2000;Fynes et al, 2005;Rai et al, 2006;Lehoux et al, 2014).…”
Section: E-business Service and Business Collaborationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Business collaboration is a long-term partnership where the parties work together, share information, resources and risks, and make joint decisions to accomplish mutual beneficial outcomes (Bowersox et al, 2003 andLehoux et al, 2014). Indeed, companies are increasingly developing collaborative relationships (van de Vijver et al, 2011).…”
Section: E-business Service and Business Collaborationmentioning
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.