2015
DOI: 10.5070/b85110009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inter-District School Choice: Transfer Policy and Practice in a Fragmented Metropolitan Region

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a result, residency requirements for school enrollment become pervasive in cases where districts with more minority students and highly educated adults are situated next to ones with more minority students and less-educated adults. This supports previous findings that white families and families of higher socioeconomic status are more likely to use interdistrict open-enrollment policies and leave disadvantaged school districts for better-performing ones (Brunner et al, 2012; Ganski, 2015; Iarussi & Larwin, 2015; Lavery & Carlson, 2015). When local authorities are aware of the dissimilarities between neighboring school districts, the allowance of nonresident students to cross-over district lines may be seen as a potential source of harm and uncertainty for the local forms of identity and governance.…”
Section: Illustrative Evidencesupporting
confidence: 90%
“…As a result, residency requirements for school enrollment become pervasive in cases where districts with more minority students and highly educated adults are situated next to ones with more minority students and less-educated adults. This supports previous findings that white families and families of higher socioeconomic status are more likely to use interdistrict open-enrollment policies and leave disadvantaged school districts for better-performing ones (Brunner et al, 2012; Ganski, 2015; Iarussi & Larwin, 2015; Lavery & Carlson, 2015). When local authorities are aware of the dissimilarities between neighboring school districts, the allowance of nonresident students to cross-over district lines may be seen as a potential source of harm and uncertainty for the local forms of identity and governance.…”
Section: Illustrative Evidencesupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Typically, researchers have used three different theories to study attendance zones. Several scholars have used Tiebout's (1956) theory of public choice to guide their work (e.g., Bischoff, 2008;Clotfelter, 2004;Faw & Jabbar, 2020;Ganski, 2015;Holme & Finnigan, 2013;Orfield, 2002;Schmidt, 1992;Weiher, 1991). In the context of the public educational system, this theory asserts that attendance zone boundaries hold the potential to segregate ''because individuals choose where to live in part on the basis of their neighbors-often opting to live near people more similar to them in terms of race/ethnicity-as well as on the basis of the school that their child will attend'' (Richards, 2014(Richards, , p. 1121.…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other school-choice policies, like inter- or intra-district transfer plans, were touted as simple ways of facilitating mobility, creating access to high-quality local options, and mitigating segregation. Yet studies find that instead of privileging the least advantaged students, these programs are plagued by issues of fragmentation, power hoarding, and biased decision making (Ganski, 2016), creating the illusion of choice and empowerment while simply reinforcing the status quo.…”
Section: Research Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%