2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.ibusrev.2005.04.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inter-country differences of consumer ethics in Arab countries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
37
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
2
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This preference likely explains the importance of stakeholders for Turks (Hunt and Vitell, 2006). This argument also receives support from Rawwas et al's (2005) empirical results, which show that Turkish consumers in ethical decision situations tend to follow defined rules rather than make decisions on their own. In contrast, consumers in individualistic societies, such as Germany, are willing to break rules if they consider it necessary (Chonko and Hunt, 1985).…”
mentioning
confidence: 65%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This preference likely explains the importance of stakeholders for Turks (Hunt and Vitell, 2006). This argument also receives support from Rawwas et al's (2005) empirical results, which show that Turkish consumers in ethical decision situations tend to follow defined rules rather than make decisions on their own. In contrast, consumers in individualistic societies, such as Germany, are willing to break rules if they consider it necessary (Chonko and Hunt, 1985).…”
mentioning
confidence: 65%
“…We spared the survey of the last-mentioned dimension, because as already observed in other studies (Al-Khatib et al, 2005), problems may appear during the implementation in non-Western countries. Regarding Hofstedes cultural dimensions Germany can be referred to as rather individualistic and Turkey can be referred to as rather collectivistic (Paşa et al, 2001).…”
Section: Consumer Ethicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No explicit codes of ethics are present in marketing, however, and hence Americans with their emphasis on universalism (Trompenaars et al, 1998) and Egyptians with their lower ethical threshold differed significantly on all three marketing scenarios with respect to both ethical dimensions being studied. Further support for this result is indicated in a study by Al-Khatib et al (2005) of inter-country differences of consumer ethics in Arab countries. In this study, Egyptian consumers were found to exhibit lower ethical concern about passively benefiting from unethical consumer oriented situations than consumers from Oman and Saudi Arabia.…”
Section: Situational Effectsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…This scale proves to be reliable and valid in several studies, either within one-country (e.g., Chiou and Pan, 2008;Vitell et al, 2007) or crossculturally (e.g., Al-Khatib et al, 2005;Rawwas et al, 2005). More specifically, the Consumer Ethics Scale examines the extent to which respondents believe certain questionable consumer practices to be appropriate or not.…”
Section: Dependent Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides, the reliabilities are in line with other consumer ethics studies (cf. Al-Khatib et al, 2005;Rawwas et al, 2005). The authors sum the appropriate items within each dimension to come up with one single numeric value for each of the four dimensions.…”
Section: Consumer Ethics: the Role Of Self-regulatory Focusmentioning
confidence: 99%