2017
DOI: 10.9753/icce.v35.currents.9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inter-Comparison of Recent Tide Models for the Persian Gulf and Oman Sea

Abstract: Using several series of field measurements data along Iranian coastline of the Persian Gulf and Gulf of Oman, eight different tide models have been evaluated in this study. By comparing the results in the frequency domain, it was found that the model discrepancies arise in shallow waters, having maximum error in the shallowest part of the Persian Gulf, where Pohl station is located. On the other hand, maximum error of tide models is limited to 10 cm in deeper part of the Persian Gulf, indicating that different… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Considering the accuracy of predictions at all stations (Table 4), Jask-Almasnaeh is selected as the open boundary. Following Ranji et al (2016), TPXO global tide model is selected to define the water level at the open boundary (Egbert and Erofeeva, 2002). Thirteen tidal constituents (M2, S2, N2, K2, K1, P1, Q1, O1, M4, MS4, MN4, P1, MM, and MF) are used to simulate the tide elevations by TPXO8.…”
Section: Field Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering the accuracy of predictions at all stations (Table 4), Jask-Almasnaeh is selected as the open boundary. Following Ranji et al (2016), TPXO global tide model is selected to define the water level at the open boundary (Egbert and Erofeeva, 2002). Thirteen tidal constituents (M2, S2, N2, K2, K1, P1, Q1, O1, M4, MS4, MN4, P1, MM, and MF) are used to simulate the tide elevations by TPXO8.…”
Section: Field Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FES2014 is based on hydrodynamic modelling with assimilation data (Zawadzki et al 2016) and takes advantage of more accurate ocean bathymetry, improved modelling and data assimilation techniques, better altimeter standards and longer altimeter time series and a refined mesh in most shallow water regions (Lei et al 2017). Ranji et al (2017) and Seifi et al (2019) compared eight different tide models in the Persian Gulf and Great Barrier Reef, Australia respectively. Both studies agree that FES2014 presents the best tidal prediction for coastal regions.…”
Section: Offshore Input Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The FES2014 atlas performance has been assessed and validated with tide gauges and various geophysical applications (satellite altimetry corrections, gravimetry, etc.). It shows significant improvements compared to previous FES releases and other state-of-the-art tidal atlases (Lyard et al 2016;Ranji et al 2016). Hourly tidal estimates were extracted from FES2014 from February 2013 to August 2016 and interpolated on the video frequency (15 min).…”
Section: ) Tide Gauge and Forecastingmentioning
confidence: 99%