2008
DOI: 10.1007/s00411-008-0186-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inter-comparison of models to estimate radionuclide activity concentrations in non-human biota

Abstract: A number of models have recently been, or are currently being, developed to enable the assessment of radiation doses from ionising radiation to non-human species. A key component of these models is the ability to predict whole-organism activity concentrations in a wide range of wildlife. In this paper, we compare the whole-organism activity concentrations predicted by eight models participating within the IAEA Environmental Modelling for Radiation Safety programme for a range of radionuclides to terrestrial an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
40
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
3
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of this exercise are evaluated in Beresford et al [6]. Subsequently, two model-data comparisons (or scenario applications) were conducted (see IAEA [2] for details):…”
Section: Intercomparison Exercisesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results of this exercise are evaluated in Beresford et al [6]. Subsequently, two model-data comparisons (or scenario applications) were conducted (see IAEA [2] for details):…”
Section: Intercomparison Exercisesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, there has been growing international interest in the assessment of doses and risks to biota resulting from exposure to radionuclides from anthropogenic sources [10][11][12]. Several models are now available that enable the assessment of radiological risk to biota [13,14]. One of these is the ERICA Tool [15], which implements the ERICA Integrated Approach [10] developed within the EC 6th Framework Programme.…”
Section: Research Notementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This scoring system, which is included in the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) guidelines as a standard method for laboratory assessment, was successfully used as a simple tool for comparison of different international approaches for the assessment of doses to non-human biota [22][23][24][25] (see the references for a description of the participant approaches). As the data considered in this study appear to be lognormally distributed, Z-scoring was performed on logarithmically transformed data for the purposes of comparison, using the following formula:…”
Section: An International Comparison Of Lietdos-bio Approaches To Assmentioning
confidence: 99%