2011
DOI: 10.1049/iet-com.2011.0131
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inter-carrier interference-free Alamouti-coded OFDM for cooperative systems with frequency offsets in non-selective fading environments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, we could see that the equivalent channel gain in every subcarrier is only quantised by 4 bit, the performance gap between RAPFQF + PRSA (4 bit quantisation) and ORA with full feedback is very small. Table 1 [1,3,1,3] in all cases. Therefore, RAPFQF + PRSA could satisfy the constraint condition of the proportional fair very well.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Moreover, we could see that the equivalent channel gain in every subcarrier is only quantised by 4 bit, the performance gap between RAPFQF + PRSA (4 bit quantisation) and ORA with full feedback is very small. Table 1 [1,3,1,3] in all cases. Therefore, RAPFQF + PRSA could satisfy the constraint condition of the proportional fair very well.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Fig. 9 depicts the relationship between the average throughput Moreover, the proportional fairness weights for mobile users are [1,3,1,3]. In Fig.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We consider the distributed antenna system that is composed of two TX antennas and one RX antenna. In each TX antenna, OFDM-modulated signals are transmitted with N total subcarriers, as in [1][2][3][4][5][6]. Let the variable x b,l denote the lth data symbol of the bth subblock and the variables X b,k denote the Alamouti-coded symbols at the kth subcarrier of bth subblock of TX antennas A and B, respectively.…”
Section: The System Model and The Ofdm Symbol Structure Of Fadac-ofdmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the main challenging issues in this area is to mitigate self-interference due to the carrier frequency offset (CFO) between the distributed transmit antennas [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8]. Very recently in [4], the so-called FADAC-OFDM (frequency-asynchronous distributed Alamouti-coded OFDM) has been proposed and shown to outperform the other existing approaches in [3][4][5]. In contrast to the conventional distributed Alamouti-coded OFDM, FADAC-OFDM is free from ICI (intercarrier interference) terms from the near subcarriers due to its ICI self-cancelation property only by simple Alamouti-decoding process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%