2014
DOI: 10.3390/rs6098594
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inter-Calibration of Satellite Passive Microwave Land Observations from AMSR-E and AMSR2 Using Overlapping FY3B-MWRI Sensor Measurements

Abstract: Abstract:The development and continuity of consistent long-term data records from similar overlapping satellite observations is critical for global monitoring and environmental change assessments. We developed an empirical approach for inter-calibration of satellite microwave brightness temperature (T b ) records over land from the Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer for EOS (AMSR-E) and Microwave Scanning Radiometer 2 (AMSR2) using overlapping T b observations from the Microwave Radiation Imager (MWRI). Do… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
56
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
56
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The altitude correction to the AMSR2 L1R data considers the actual surface of the Earth instead of an ideal Earth ellipsoid (T. , which helps to ensure reliable analysis of AMSR-E/2 land surface retrievals over high elevation areas, including the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau; (2) a similar gridding process was performed on the AMSR2 L1R swath data. (3) The AMSR2 multifrequency (X-to W-band) T b retrievals were empirically calibrated against the same AMSR-E channels using similar overlapping T b observations from the Microwave Radiation Imager (MWRI) onboard the Chinese FY3B satellite (Du et al, 2014). However, in contrast to Du et al (2014) in which the T b calibration was conducted on a per grid cell basis for each frequency, polarization, and orbit, the approach used for this investigation involved calibrating within 5 × 5 grid cell windows to minimize the impact of the different sensor footprints.…”
Section: Amsr-e and Amsr2 T B Records Used For Land Parameter Retrievalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The altitude correction to the AMSR2 L1R data considers the actual surface of the Earth instead of an ideal Earth ellipsoid (T. , which helps to ensure reliable analysis of AMSR-E/2 land surface retrievals over high elevation areas, including the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau; (2) a similar gridding process was performed on the AMSR2 L1R swath data. (3) The AMSR2 multifrequency (X-to W-band) T b retrievals were empirically calibrated against the same AMSR-E channels using similar overlapping T b observations from the Microwave Radiation Imager (MWRI) onboard the Chinese FY3B satellite (Du et al, 2014). However, in contrast to Du et al (2014) in which the T b calibration was conducted on a per grid cell basis for each frequency, polarization, and orbit, the approach used for this investigation involved calibrating within 5 × 5 grid cell windows to minimize the impact of the different sensor footprints.…”
Section: Amsr-e and Amsr2 T B Records Used For Land Parameter Retrievalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The LPDR v1 has also served as a baseline for evaluating other AMSR-E algorithm retrievals (Mladenova et al, 2014) and refinements (Jang et al, 2014;Du et al, 2014). The LPDR v1 encompasses the AMSR-E record (2002)(2003)(2004)(2005)(2006)(2007)(2008)(2009)(2010)(2011), while similar observations from AMSR2 enable potential LPDR continuity (Du et al, 2014).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Meanwhile the instrument configurations of AMSR-E and MWRI are similar and they also have nearly simultaneous satellite overpass and data acquisition times. As shown in Table 1, except for the calibration system, the channel setting and view geometry of MWRI are almost identical to the AMSR-E (Kawanishi et al, 2003;Yang et al, 2012;Du et al, 2014). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…The method was used to generate a global soil moisture product for the period 2002-2013 based on observations from AMSR-E (June 2002-September 2011) and similar sensors, including MWRI (October 2011-June 2012) and AMSR2 (July 2012-December 2013). To ensure consistent observations over different sensors, an inter-sensor calibration technique proposed in [44] was used to calibrate AMSR2 and MWRI brightness temperature datasets. The soil moisture product was provided in a geographic latitude/longitude projection at a spatial resolution of 0.25˝(about 25 km at the Equator) and a daily temporal resolution.…”
Section: Soil Moisture Datamentioning
confidence: 99%