2002
DOI: 10.1016/s1055-7903(02)00243-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inter- and intraspecific evolutionary relationships of the rice frog Rana limnocharis and the allied species R. cancrivora inferred from crossing experiments and mitochondrial DNA sequences of the 12S and 16S rRNA genes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The primers were also used for DNA sequencing. We used the following additional primers for sequencing when necessary: F51 and R51 (Sumida et al, 2002), 16S_R530 and 16S_R723 (Hasan et al, 2012a), R1051 (5´-ATGTTTTTGGTAAACAGGCGGG-3´), FR60 (5´-AAGCAAGTCGTAACATGGTA-3´), 16S_Rev1_SMA (5´-GGTTATTGTTAAGCTTTAACGC-3´), and 16S_Rev2_ CANCRI (5´-GAGAAATTAAGCTTTAACGC-3´). The length of the resultant 16S fragments varied from 1287 to 1354 bp between taxa.…”
Section: Dna Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The primers were also used for DNA sequencing. We used the following additional primers for sequencing when necessary: F51 and R51 (Sumida et al, 2002), 16S_R530 and 16S_R723 (Hasan et al, 2012a), R1051 (5´-ATGTTTTTGGTAAACAGGCGGG-3´), FR60 (5´-AAGCAAGTCGTAACATGGTA-3´), 16S_Rev1_SMA (5´-GGTTATTGTTAAGCTTTAACGC-3´), and 16S_Rev2_ CANCRI (5´-GAGAAATTAAGCTTTAACGC-3´). The length of the resultant 16S fragments varied from 1287 to 1354 bp between taxa.…”
Section: Dna Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In many cases, the members of this genus possess relatively few diagnostics; thus, the genus becomes one of the most problematic anuran taxa taxonomically (e.g., Kotaki et al, 2008). Indeed, F. cancrivora has occasionally been mistaken as its closely related species, F. limnocharis (e.g., Inger, 1954; but see Sumida et al, 2002). For the above reasons, usable molecular information, such as mt genomic data, and detailed phylogenetic analyses on this taxon have been expected.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Total genomic DNA of each individual was extracted from clipped toes using a DNeasy Blood and Tissue Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) following the manufacturer's instructions. PCR amplification of the partial 16S rRNA gene was performed in a 20-mL volume containing 10-mL of EmeraldAmp MAX PCR Master Mix (TaKaRa), 1 mL of genomic DNA solution, and 2 mL of the 10 mM primer pair F51 (5 0 -CCCGCCTGTTTACCAAAAACAT-3 0 ) and R51 (5 0 -GGTCTGAACTCAGATCACGTA-3 0 ) (Sumida et al, 2002). Thermal cycling was performed under the following conditions: 95 C for 3 min, followed by 35 cycles of 95 C for 30 s, 55 C for 30 s, and 72 C for 30 s. PCR products were digested with SpeI and HphI separately and visualized by electrophoresis on 2.0% agarose gel.…”
Section: Identification Of Frog Speciesmentioning
confidence: 99%