2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2006.12.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inter- and Intraobserver Repeatability of the Salford Gait Tool: An Observation-Based Clinical Gait Assessment Tool

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The sample size was determined to guarantee a minimum number of subjects, which provided a wide range and the most even spread of variability in TUG performances, as was recommended (18,19,29) and previously adopted (15,(30)(31)(32).…”
Section: Second Phase: Intra-and Inter-rater Reliability Of the Tug-absmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sample size was determined to guarantee a minimum number of subjects, which provided a wide range and the most even spread of variability in TUG performances, as was recommended (18,19,29) and previously adopted (15,(30)(31)(32).…”
Section: Second Phase: Intra-and Inter-rater Reliability Of the Tug-absmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SF-GT evaluates in a sagittal plane the position of the lower limb joints during six specific events of the gait cycle. A good reproducibility is reported for the tool, the mean percentage agreement was found to be 77% and 75% for inter-and intra-rater reliability, respectively (Toro et al, 2007). Some studies (Ong et al, 2008, Viehweger et al, 2010, Brunnekreef et al, 2005 showed that the reliability of observational gait analysis may be influenced by the clinical experience of the raters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…When a person demonstrates a pathological gait strategy in the transverse plane, this will give a false image when estimating joint angles by the use of a sagittal plane video recording. Several studies have reported the reliability of VGA to be satisfactory [4][5][6][7][8]16]. However, reliability does not guarantee validity, and responsiveness includes them both [11].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to the categorical approach in most VGA-tools, the Salford Gait Tool (SF-GT) [9] is based on visually estimation of exact joint angles in the hip, knee and ankle at six selected events during the gait cycle, and then categorisation of them. The validity and reliability or SF-GT in children with CP has been established by comparing SF-GT with sagittal 3DGA kinematics [9,16]. Another study using a quantitative approach [17], compares measurements of six selected joint angles on a video screen using software program with simultaneous 3DGA sagittal kinematics.…”
Section: Reported Bothmentioning
confidence: 99%