2008
DOI: 10.1007/s11102-008-0123-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inter- and intra-observer variability in detection and progression assessment with MRI of microadenoma in Cushing’s disease patients followed up after bilateral adrenalectomy

Abstract: Pituitary MRI study of patients with Cushing disease treated by adrenalectomy remains difficult. In practice, interpretation of MRI studies by a well-experienced reader should be preferred, unless a final decision can be reached by consensus between two and several readers.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
6
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the 55% threshold was based on studies published at the time PRIMARYS was designed (7); none of these trials used the same design, and populations were commonly a mixture of patients with micro- and macroadenomas, possibly enriching study populations with responders. Moreover, tumor volume measurements are greatly influenced by inter- and intra-reader variabilities (23). Although considerable efforts were made to minimize variabilities in PRIMARYS, with three-quarters of scan measurements for the primary endpoint adjudicated because they differed by ≥ 10%, we cannot rule out that residual variability influenced the findings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the 55% threshold was based on studies published at the time PRIMARYS was designed (7); none of these trials used the same design, and populations were commonly a mixture of patients with micro- and macroadenomas, possibly enriching study populations with responders. Moreover, tumor volume measurements are greatly influenced by inter- and intra-reader variabilities (23). Although considerable efforts were made to minimize variabilities in PRIMARYS, with three-quarters of scan measurements for the primary endpoint adjudicated because they differed by ≥ 10%, we cannot rule out that residual variability influenced the findings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This group of patients commonly has migraine due to changes in estradiol levels, so it is important not to incorrectly attribute migraine to a normal pituitary lesion in this situation. Pituitary microadenomas appear as low-density lesions on MRI and there is wide inter-and intraobserver variation between radiologists when commenting on the presence or absence of a microadenoma [29]. Radiological artefact due the partial volume effect may give the optical illusion of a low-density lesion within the pituitary gland on MRI.…”
Section: Potential Pitfallsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, inter-rater differences are not uncommon when assessing pituitary pathologies through imaging. 31,32 A limitation of our study is the cohort size. A larger patient cohort is necessary to better compare the sensitivities of CE-VIBE and CISS sequences to detect pituitary adenomas in CD patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%