2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijso.2020.10.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inter-and intra-observer reliability of scoliogauge app to assess the axial trunk rotation of scoliosis: Prospective reliability analysis study

Abstract: Background: Axial of trunk rotation is a key distinguishing feature in the diagnosis of structural scoliosis. The non-affordability, high cost, and non-availability of clinical scoliometer device and availability of the mobile application like scoliogauge to measure the angle of this rotation has led to frequent usage. However, the reliability of such applications should be assessed on the specific population before using them for screening scoliosis. Objective: … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The reliability of Scoliogauge was also evaluated by Getnet et al [ 22 ] who used the iPhone 4 to evaluate intra- and inter-rater ICC. The observers did not choose to use a sleeve to place the device in, but rather used their thumbs to balance it on the back of their participants.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The reliability of Scoliogauge was also evaluated by Getnet et al [ 22 ] who used the iPhone 4 to evaluate intra- and inter-rater ICC. The observers did not choose to use a sleeve to place the device in, but rather used their thumbs to balance it on the back of their participants.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even though the authors did not calculate the MDC, using the formula MDC 95%CI = SEM × √2 × 1.96, the result is 16.54°. Although the authors [ 22 ] provided evidence towards the excellent intra-rater reliability of Scoliogauge, the high standard error and the derived MDC prove that this application, in combination with the manner used to assess ATR, is not suitable for clinical application [ 6 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation