2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2014.06.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inter- and intra-individual variation in urinary biomarker concentrations over a 6-day sampling period. Part 2: Personal care product ingredients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
86
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(95 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
8
86
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This wide range of ICCs reflects the complications associated with relying on ICC values when exploring intra-individual variability for urinary TCS. For example, as noted by Koch et al (2014), "In many cases the relatively high ICC values in the current study derived from large between-individual differences in exposure levels rather than from low within-individual variation … " Koch et al further observe that a single spot sample may "substantially over-or under-represent average exposure to that individual." Similarly, referring to ICCs of around 0.5-0.6, Philippat et al (2013) stated: "Although a correlation of this magnitude is greater than reported for many other rapidly metabolized compounds, it may still result in bias due to exposure misclassification if the putative window of susceptibility is distant from the sample collection period … To limit the effects of exposure misclassification, studies of the effects of phenol prenatal exposure on health should try to collect multiple urine samples during pregnancy.…”
Section: Exposure Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…This wide range of ICCs reflects the complications associated with relying on ICC values when exploring intra-individual variability for urinary TCS. For example, as noted by Koch et al (2014), "In many cases the relatively high ICC values in the current study derived from large between-individual differences in exposure levels rather than from low within-individual variation … " Koch et al further observe that a single spot sample may "substantially over-or under-represent average exposure to that individual." Similarly, referring to ICCs of around 0.5-0.6, Philippat et al (2013) stated: "Although a correlation of this magnitude is greater than reported for many other rapidly metabolized compounds, it may still result in bias due to exposure misclassification if the putative window of susceptibility is distant from the sample collection period … To limit the effects of exposure misclassification, studies of the effects of phenol prenatal exposure on health should try to collect multiple urine samples during pregnancy.…”
Section: Exposure Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…If properly collected and treated, human urine could be a promising and rich source of the reclaimed water to meet various needs, especially in areas with dense population but shortage of water. However, pharmaceuticals and personal care products were unfavorably found in human urine (Koch et al, 2014;Magiera and Baranowsica, 2014), which posed potential health risks for water reuse from source-separated urine. On the other hand, although urine from healthy humans does not generally contain pathogens, it is still a challenge that source-separated urine may involve pathogens due to the faecal contamination (Hoglund et al, 1998), such as enteric bacteria and coliphage MS2 (Chandran et al, 2009), rhesus rotavirus and Salmonella typhimurium phage 28B (Hoglund et al, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although of moderate sample size, a general population sample was enrolled preconception, and male partner data was concurrently modeled with females in a comprehensive analysis incorporating confounding variables. However, the use of a single baseline urine may have misclassified exposure at conception, leading to underestimated effects, in particular for phthalates and BPA [89,90].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Women with pregnancies were recruited, and TTP was assessed retrospectively without incorporation of male factors. Furthermore, misclassification associated with the use of a first trimester urine biomarker for retrospective exposure assignment is likely to underestimate effects, in particular for phthalates and BPA [89,90]. However, the large study size provided for ample statistical power to detect modest associations, and comprehensive statistical and sensitivity analyses were completed.…”
Section: Maternal-infant Research On Environmental Chemicals Studymentioning
confidence: 99%