2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2013.04.078
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intentional foreign object ingestions: need for endoscopy and surgery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
40
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
40
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite careful questioning and history taking, we were unable to ascertain the specific time point at which the patient might have accidentally ingested the foreign object. About 80% -90% of ingested foreign objects pass through the gastrointestinal tract with minimal intervention [4]. Another 10% -20% of such cases require endoscopic removal [4] [5] [6].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Despite careful questioning and history taking, we were unable to ascertain the specific time point at which the patient might have accidentally ingested the foreign object. About 80% -90% of ingested foreign objects pass through the gastrointestinal tract with minimal intervention [4]. Another 10% -20% of such cases require endoscopic removal [4] [5] [6].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…About 80% -90% of ingested foreign objects pass through the gastrointestinal tract with minimal intervention [4]. Another 10% -20% of such cases require endoscopic removal [4] [5] [6].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Incarcerated persons, psychiatric patients, and those with behavioral problems have a higher incidence of ingestion with multiple objects and recurring ingestions, and more often require intervention. In one study, 69% of cases from intentional FB ingestion required endoscopic intervention, and 22% required surgery (Dalal et al, 2013). The most common objects ingested by children are coins, magnets, batteries, small toys, plastics, jewelry and buttons (Shar & Mamula, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other items may include metallic objects (ie rings) or dentures (Yuan et al, 2017) (Ambe et al, 2012) (ASGE, 2011). A study of intentional ingestions within the incarcerated population found a variety of objects such as pens, razorblades, utensils, hardware, bed springs, toothbrushes, glass, batteries, and various metal objects (Dalal et al, 2013). The location of impaction, perforation, or obstruction varies with object type, but not necessarily with age, and may be associated with physiological narrowing, underlying pathology, previous surgery, or congenital malformations (Geng et all, 2017) (Yuan et al, 2017) (Shah & Mamula, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ingestion of true foreign bodies (i.e., nonfood objects) occurs more commonly in children than in adults [1]. In adults, foreign body ingestion appears usually in patients with intellectual impairment, psychiatric illness, alcohol intoxication, or in the elderly population and in prisoners seeking secondary gain [2, 3, 4, 5]. Dentures, coins, and buttons are commonly swallowed objects [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%