2001
DOI: 10.1080/089419201753242797
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intention to Conserve Water: Environmental Values, Planned Behavior, and Information Effects. A Comparison of Three Communities Sharing a Watershed

Abstract: This article examines a set of constructs underlying water conservation behavior in three distinct communities located in the California± Nevada T ruckee River W atershed. Using the theory of planned behavior as a theoretical base, we focus on the additional explanatory power of environmental values and information. T he analysis, based on 733 telephone interviews, indicates that signi® cant differences in these variables do not appear across the communities. An analysis of the full watershed shows that the th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
32
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 109 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
3
32
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Attitude toward water conservation refers to the degree to which a resident has a positive or negative evaluation of water conservation behaviors (Ajzen, 1991;Armitage & Conner, 2001;Trumbo & O'Keefe, 2001). Willis, Stewart, Panuwatwanich, Williams, and Hollingsworth (2011) found residents who had very positive water conservation and environmental attitudes saved more water than those with moderately positive attitudes.…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Attitude toward water conservation refers to the degree to which a resident has a positive or negative evaluation of water conservation behaviors (Ajzen, 1991;Armitage & Conner, 2001;Trumbo & O'Keefe, 2001). Willis, Stewart, Panuwatwanich, Williams, and Hollingsworth (2011) found residents who had very positive water conservation and environmental attitudes saved more water than those with moderately positive attitudes.…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subjective norms are the general social pressure an individual perceives to perform or not perform a specific behavior such as conserving water (Ajzen, 1988;1991;Trumbo & O'Keefe, 2001). Subjective norms are conceptualized as perceived approval or expectations of water conservation behavior felt externally (Ajzen, 1988;Armitage & Conner, 2001;Trumbo & O'Keefe, 2001). Schultz, Nolan, Cialdini, Goldstein, and Griskevicius (2007) found positive subjective norms promoted energy use reductions among individual households.…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hunter & Rinner, 2004;Trumbo & O'Keefe, 2001. The presentation of information regarding policies for building a water conservation society may have enhanced local residents' awareness of local water resources, the gap between water supply and demand, and the negative economic and ecological consequences associated with water shortages and water waste and may have increased residents' knowledge regarding their own ability to conserve water.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Sparks & Shepherd, 1992), water conservation (e.g. Trumbo & O'Keefe, 2001, risk information processing (e.g. Griffin et al, 1999) and health communication (e.g.…”
Section: Attitudes Toward Water Conservation and Subjective Norms Accmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation