2018
DOI: 10.1111/infa.12267
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intention or Attention Before Pointing: Do Infants’ Early Holdout Gestures Reflect Evidence of a Declarative Motive?

Abstract: Gestures are the first signs of intentional communication within prelinguistic infants and can reflect various motives, including a declarative motive to share attention and interest. The ability to use gestures declaratively has been linked to later language development; therefore, it is important to understand the origins of this motive. Previous research has focused on the use of declarative pointing at around 12 months; however, other potential forms of declarative communication, such as holdout gestures, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
9
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Index finger pointing and HoGs gestures are claimed to be more cognitively complex than reaching gestures as they require the infant to have some understanding of the cognitive effects of their actions on others (e.g., Tomasello, 1999) and therefore provide infants with a practice ground for the subsequent emergence of language. In terms of the relationship between HoG and points, we only found a positive relationship in the English sample and so the data provide limited support for claims that these early communicative gestures have developmental significance for the emergence of index finger pointing (e.g., Bates et al, 1975; Boundy, Cameron‐Faulkner, & Theakston, 2019; Cameron‐Faulkner et al, 2015). It is possible that these findings indicate cultural differences, however, a word of caution in interpreting the results of these models is in order, due to low statistical power.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 90%
“…Index finger pointing and HoGs gestures are claimed to be more cognitively complex than reaching gestures as they require the infant to have some understanding of the cognitive effects of their actions on others (e.g., Tomasello, 1999) and therefore provide infants with a practice ground for the subsequent emergence of language. In terms of the relationship between HoG and points, we only found a positive relationship in the English sample and so the data provide limited support for claims that these early communicative gestures have developmental significance for the emergence of index finger pointing (e.g., Bates et al, 1975; Boundy, Cameron‐Faulkner, & Theakston, 2019; Cameron‐Faulkner et al, 2015). It is possible that these findings indicate cultural differences, however, a word of caution in interpreting the results of these models is in order, due to low statistical power.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 90%
“…Since this behaviour was almost always gaze‐coordinated, it is impossible to test whether specifically gaze‐coordinated instances of the gesture were predictive. While it is likely that this gesture is produced with communicative intent (Boundy et al, ), this is hard to unpack using our data. However, we have demonstrated the link between showing and later language that has been hypothesized, but empirically tested only once, on a small sample (Bates et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Giving and showing gestures (both coordinated with gaze at above chance levels) are adult‐directed, and the physical configuration of showing in particular (holding objects up to caregiver's face) likely facilitates infants’ looking to their caregivers’ face more readily than with pointing to other entities. Likewise, giving and showing gestures involve objects within the infant's grasp, while pointing (especially in relation to more distal stimuli) is thought to be more cognitively complex, perhaps accounting for greater difficulty in gaze‐coordination at this age (see also Boundy, Cameron‐Faulkner, & Theakston, ; Carpenter et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More generally, this study has not only joined other recent work in calling for greater attention to be paid to infants' showing and giving gestures [14][15][16][17][18], but has also stressed the importance of understanding the developmental pathway that leads to the emergence of conventional showing, giving and other gestures. Pursuing this question further will help contribute to an understanding of humans' early capacity and motivation for social interaction, as well as the core role played by gestures [36].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%