2006
DOI: 10.2514/1.14348
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intent Inference with Path Prediction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the following subsections, the constraints for each flight mode in the descent and approach phase are specified, and the corresponding continuous dynamics of the aircraft with wind disturbance are derived from the general equations of motion [Eqs. (4)(5)(6)(7)(8)] [17,18]. …”
Section: Continuous State Dynamics Of Aircraftmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the following subsections, the constraints for each flight mode in the descent and approach phase are specified, and the corresponding continuous dynamics of the aircraft with wind disturbance are derived from the general equations of motion [Eqs. (4)(5)(6)(7)(8)] [17,18]. …”
Section: Continuous State Dynamics Of Aircraftmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because these models cannot accurately capture the maneuver uncertainty of the aircraft, they could cause large errors and only work for short look-ahead times. To improve the prediction accuracy, there have been efforts to incorporate flight intent information into prediction models [6][7][8]. If a specific flight intent is inferred from the current estimated states, then a specific prediction model corresponding to the inferred flight intent is chosen to predict the future trajectory.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The methods of flight intent inference based on the Maximum Likelihood principle have been proposed 11,15,16 where the most likely flight intent can be chosen as follows:Î…”
Section: Ib Previous Approaches For Conformance Monitoringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The aircraft which does not follow its flight plan, otherwise called non-conforming aircraft, is quite prevalent not only because the pilots misunderstand the controller's instructions via voice communications but also because the controllers do not update the currently issued clearances into their computer systems; in the latter case, a decision support tool may need to declare the aircraft as non-conforming its plan although the aircraft is following exactly to the voice clearance. Although more reliable and frequently updated information on flight plan is available in near future thank to the advanced data-link technologies such as Automatic Dependent Surveillance Broadcast (ADS-B), the needs for detecting non-conformance aircraft is still exist due to the following reasons: [10][11][12][13] 1) The filed or broadcasted flight plan information still needs to be independently verified for the safety and security reasons. Furthermore, an additional source of uncertainty on how the pilots actually execute the planned trajectory, e.g., "slow" to "fast" climb or descent to the cleared altitude, exists and needs to be identified.…”
Section: Ia 4-dimension Trajectory Prediction and Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the flight intention should also be considered. Krozel [8] proposed a method for inferring the intention and structured a process for obtaining the best fit to an intent model for observed aircraft motions, where the horizontal, vertical, and speed dimensions were investigated independently, and then combined to fully explain the three-dimensional guidance and navigation plan of an aircraft. Yepes [9] used a hybrid estimation algorithm to estimate the aircraft's state and flight mode, these estimates were then combined with the knowledge of air traffic control regulations, the aircraft's flight plan, and the environment to infer the pilot's intention.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%