2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2020.104394
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intensive Family Preservation Services to prevent out-of-home placement of children: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract: A systematic review and meta-analysis If you'd like this publication in an alternative format such as Braille,

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
11
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
11
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Interventions such as this-that focus on a two-generational approach (a parent and the child)-and on drawing together or improving elements within a child's daily life or ecology of influence-have also been shown to be effective in other selective prevention programs such as in child welfare with multi-stressed families (44,(89)(90)(91). Core to positive outcomes in research in this area, however, rely on program fidelity and implementation support strategies to that ensure program elements are delivered as intended (92,93).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interventions such as this-that focus on a two-generational approach (a parent and the child)-and on drawing together or improving elements within a child's daily life or ecology of influence-have also been shown to be effective in other selective prevention programs such as in child welfare with multi-stressed families (44,(89)(90)(91). Core to positive outcomes in research in this area, however, rely on program fidelity and implementation support strategies to that ensure program elements are delivered as intended (92,93).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some have been addressed through the same programme of work (e.g. systematic reviews of the impact on children being in care of intensive family preservation services and shared decisionmaking meetings (Bezeczky et al, 2020;Nurmatov et al, 2020)). A further question that could be addressed in a future systematic review is, as one of the main intervention types for trying to reduce the need for care, 'Are parental skill building programmes effective at reducing care entry/improving reunification?'…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intensive family preservation and reunification services are designed to keep children safe in the care of their parents and prevent child removal or subsequent placement into out-of-home care (OOHC; alternative accommodation when children cannot live at home safely [ 1 ]). They are effective in preventing children from entering OOHC 24 months post program engagement [ 2 , 3 , 4 ]. The effect of these programs is moderated by the sex and age of the child, parent age, the number of children and risk factors in the family, and practitioner caseload; greater effects (i.e., less OOHC placements) have been observed among families with boys and older parental age, whereas families with older and a greater number of children, single-parents, and higher caseloads were associated with reduced effects (i.e., more OOHC placements [ 5 ]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to determine the effectiveness of the program, outcomes including parental knowledge, parenting skills, and capability; child development, adolescent behaviour and education attendance; connection to and use of family services; and protection from child abuse and neglect, were chosen in consultation with key stakeholders. These outcomes are associated with healthy, resilient and thriving children, and the work of family preservation and reunification programs [ 2 , 5 ]. Familial complexity, OOHC experience, and trauma, are risk factors for child abuse and neglect, which is under measured in current preservation programs [ 7 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%