2015
DOI: 10.1080/02640414.2015.1056822
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intensity, recovery kinetics and well-being indices are not altered during an official FIFA futsal tournament in Oceanian players

Abstract: Physiological responses (intensity and recovery kinetics) and well-being indices were examined during a 4-day FIFA international tournament. Ten outfield New Caledonian players (age: 25.5 ± 3.8 years; height: 170 ± 7 cm; weight: 70.7 ± 8.6 kg) were assessed during the four matches. Players' aerobic and anaerobic capacities were measured before the tournament while heart rate (HR), intra-matches recovery and well-being indices (Hooper index) were measured throughout the tournament. HR (168 ± 8 bpm), exercise in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

2
24
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
2
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…other reports also showed 86% of HR max in 13 official matches in brazil [8], 88% of HR max in 2 matches [9], 90% of HR max in a simulated match [10] and in 2 matches [11]. Considering that a given % HR reserve corresponded to a higher % of HR max [1], it would be concluded, on the basis of these studies, that the intensity of a futsal match ranged from 86% to 90% of HR max . In football, HR equalled 171 bpm in 2 simulated matches [12], 81-84% of HR max [13], 168 bpm corresponding to 85% of HR max in 2 competitive matches [14], 86% of HR max in a friendly match [15], and 80-90% of HR max in a systematic review [16].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 51%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…other reports also showed 86% of HR max in 13 official matches in brazil [8], 88% of HR max in 2 matches [9], 90% of HR max in a simulated match [10] and in 2 matches [11]. Considering that a given % HR reserve corresponded to a higher % of HR max [1], it would be concluded, on the basis of these studies, that the intensity of a futsal match ranged from 86% to 90% of HR max . In football, HR equalled 171 bpm in 2 simulated matches [12], 81-84% of HR max [13], 168 bpm corresponding to 85% of HR max in 2 competitive matches [14], 86% of HR max in a friendly match [15], and 80-90% of HR max in a systematic review [16].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 51%
“…owing to the large variation of HR max between athletes [6,7], relative values are preferred. In futsal, HR of 168 bpm was reported, corresponding to 83% of HR reserve in matches during a 4-day FIFA international tournament [1]. other reports also showed 86% of HR max in 13 official matches in brazil [8], 88% of HR max in 2 matches [9], 90% of HR max in a simulated match [10] and in 2 matches [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…5,6 34 Previous analysis estimated that professional futsal players perform at a high intensity (> 35 80% VO 2max ) which consists of 46% of total game distance or time. 7,8 Although there is 36 some research on physiolological demands of futsal include agility and high-intensity 37 runing, 5,11,10,11 investigations into futsal skill performance which include shooting and 38 dribbling are rare, 11 and thus may hinder coaches' ability to optimize training. 39 Furthermore, current futsal tests may have some limitations such as examination 40 of one parameter (i.e., aerobic fitness).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The game is played between two teams of five players each. The sport is characterized by aerobic and anaerobic metabolic demands, and the competitive futsal season includes weekly microcycles of training, tapering, competition, and recovery (Garcia-Tabar et al, 2015 ; Charlot et al, 2016 ; Sarmento et al, 2016 ). During a match, players may suffer injuries due to muscle fatigue and contact or collision among players, resulting in inflammation (de Moura et al, 2012 , 2013 ; Beato et al, 2016 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%