2021
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2017342118
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intensity of the Earth's magnetic field: Evidence for a Mid-Paleozoic dipole low

Abstract: Significance Variations in past geomagnetic field strength are important indicators of variation in deep Earth processes over hundreds of millions of years. Most other geophysical methods only provide a snapshot of the Earth’s recent interior, and deep Earth materials are poorly represented in the geological record. Recent measurements from Scotland (Northern United Kingdom), in addition to the existing datasets, show the field was relatively weak (less than half the strength of the long-term average… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, a middle Visean high reversal frequency seems compatible with current datasets from the Late Devonian (gray curve in Figure 13; Green et al., 2021; curve from Hounslow, 2022). It is further consistent with the very low paleointensity estimates recovered from the coeval Kinghorn Volcanics that define the youngest point of the “mid‐Paleozoic Dipole Low” (Hawkins et al., 2021). The fact that the mid‐Paleozoic is temporally equidistant to the Middle Jurassic and the Late Ediacaran is suggestive of a ∼200 Myr quasi‐cyclicity in paleomagnetic field behavior (Biggin et al., 2012).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…However, a middle Visean high reversal frequency seems compatible with current datasets from the Late Devonian (gray curve in Figure 13; Green et al., 2021; curve from Hounslow, 2022). It is further consistent with the very low paleointensity estimates recovered from the coeval Kinghorn Volcanics that define the youngest point of the “mid‐Paleozoic Dipole Low” (Hawkins et al., 2021). The fact that the mid‐Paleozoic is temporally equidistant to the Middle Jurassic and the Late Ediacaran is suggestive of a ∼200 Myr quasi‐cyclicity in paleomagnetic field behavior (Biggin et al., 2012).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Our new findings regarding the PCRS appear to rule out the second scenario (since the axial dipole does appear to have been enhanced at the expense of the rest of the field during this time). The observation that average VDM also appears to have been elevated during the PCRS (Hawkins et al., 2021) rather supports the first scenario, or somewhere on the spectrum near to it. Likewise, if the duration of the MDL was shown to coincide with the time interval represented by the combined Pre‐CNS and Post‐PCRS then this could suggest that an increased contribution from the non‐axial dipole field was a factor in the lower average VDM.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The efficiency of the magnetic field since 450 Ma has been governed by zonal and non-zonal variations in core-mantle boundary heat flow 55 superimposed on the dominant degree-2 deep mantle structure, as evidenced by variations in paleointensity and reversal frequency since the early developments of Pangea in the Devonian on ~200 Myr time scales 7,11,17,19,20,[56][57][58] . But post ~450 Ma convection has not changed the dominant degree-2 mantle structure, which remains as the principal factor controlling the nature of inner core growth.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%