2017
DOI: 10.1590/s1980-6574201700020002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intensity-dependent effects of cycling exercise on corticospinal excitability in healthy humans: a pilot study

Abstract: -Aims: the aim of this study was to verify the effects of different intensities of locomotor exercise on corticospinal excitability. Methods: 18 healthy subjects (27.6 ± 6.5 years,) participated in a design study of three different exercise protocols on a cycle ergometer: (i) 10 min at 75% Wmax (high intensity); (ii) 15min at 60% Wmax (moderate intensity) or (iii) 30 min at 45% Wmax (low intensity). The protocols of lower body cycling were assigned in random order in separate sessions. A control session was do… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 30 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At the cortical level, a single session of aerobic exercise increases corticospinal tract excitability (CSE) and reduces GABA A inhibition in the motor cortex, both of which are associated with improvements in motor skill retention 10 , 17 . However, individuals who are inactive or have low physical activity levels do not have changes in CSE after a single session of aerobic exercise compared to those with high physical activity levels 25 , 26 . Therefore, individuals with different aerobic fitness levels may have variable neuroplasticity-related responses to aerobic exercise (e.g., changes in neurochemical release or CSE), and thus, have different motor learning outcomes after aerobic exercise.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…At the cortical level, a single session of aerobic exercise increases corticospinal tract excitability (CSE) and reduces GABA A inhibition in the motor cortex, both of which are associated with improvements in motor skill retention 10 , 17 . However, individuals who are inactive or have low physical activity levels do not have changes in CSE after a single session of aerobic exercise compared to those with high physical activity levels 25 , 26 . Therefore, individuals with different aerobic fitness levels may have variable neuroplasticity-related responses to aerobic exercise (e.g., changes in neurochemical release or CSE), and thus, have different motor learning outcomes after aerobic exercise.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%