1992
DOI: 10.1016/0022-0728(92)85129-q
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intensity- and frequency-dependent effects of microwaves on cell growth rates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
14
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
4
14
1
Order By: Relevance
“…7). As mentioned earlier, data about effects of radiofrequency fields on plants are rare, but our results are in agreement with results of animal and cell studies that suggest the effects of radiofrequency fields are frequency dependent and are not linear over the whole field intensity spectrum [Grundler, 1992]. The exposure to 9.575 GHz modulated with square waves of different pulse repetition frequencies induced frequency dependent biological effects in Anabaena dolilum while different microwave frequencies in continuous waves and modulated modes produced significantly different physiological effects on the alga Nostoc muscorum [Banik et al, 2003].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 95%
“…7). As mentioned earlier, data about effects of radiofrequency fields on plants are rare, but our results are in agreement with results of animal and cell studies that suggest the effects of radiofrequency fields are frequency dependent and are not linear over the whole field intensity spectrum [Grundler, 1992]. The exposure to 9.575 GHz modulated with square waves of different pulse repetition frequencies induced frequency dependent biological effects in Anabaena dolilum while different microwave frequencies in continuous waves and modulated modes produced significantly different physiological effects on the alga Nostoc muscorum [Banik et al, 2003].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 95%
“…Each cell line appears to have specific field strengths, modulations, frequencies and exposure durations that will result in a biophysical interaction with that RF field (Ivaschuk et al, 1997;Mashevich et al, 2003). This observation is particularly supported by the earlier work of Grundler (1992) upon yeast cells. At higher field intensities (10 mW/cm 2 ), yeast cell growth rates were markedly decreased when exposed to a microwave field only within a narrow frequency window, between 41,690 and 41,705 MHz.…”
Section: The Impact Of Rf-emfs On Cell Viability and Apoptosismentioning
confidence: 66%
“…As a matter of fact, there is not even a sustainable hypothesis for biological effects and the involvement of demodulation as a consequence of weak narrow band phase or frequency shift keying signals in the body. In some publications the authors observed biological effects like an increased efflux of calcium in the neurons, change in electroencephalogram (EEG), or alteration in the growth characteristics of the cells at a particular frequency and a certain individual modulation (e.g., Adey 1980;Bawin et al 1975;Grundler 1992;Keilmann and Kell 1983). These effects were explained by so-called frequency windows and other theories.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%