1968
DOI: 10.1007/bf00418662
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intensit�t und Qualit�t in der Geruchswahrnehmung

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1972
1972
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It seems likely that lack of intensity control may have accounted for a considerable part of the variance attributed to odor quality (cf. Wender, 1968). The unsolved issue of whether the sense of smell is synthetic or analytic is relevant in the present context.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It seems likely that lack of intensity control may have accounted for a considerable part of the variance attributed to odor quality (cf. Wender, 1968). The unsolved issue of whether the sense of smell is synthetic or analytic is relevant in the present context.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In olfaction multidimensional scaling has been performed by Bienfang (1941), , Wender (1968), Woskow (1968), and Lange (1970). The typical strategy in these studies of odor has been to attempt to maximize the diversity of odorants in order to obtain the most reliable description of the whole odor space without considering the intensity of the odors.…”
Section: University Of Stockholm Swedenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Existing schemes of odor classification (e.g.. Amoore, Henning) are based on typologies rather than stimulus features or sensory dimensions, and there is little evidence that subjects can or do use these categories when judging odor quality (Cain, 1978). Subjects could have based their pitch matches along such putative olfactory dimensions as dullaromatic (Wender, 1968). heavy-light, bright-dark, or hard-soft (Klutky, 1990).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Since olfactory perception is a phasic-tonic sensory stimulus, there would have been a likelihood that the participants would have performed worse due to the sequential study design [ 18 ]. For this reason, the correct answer rates of the control group were examined separately according to a scent and test approach.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%