2012
DOI: 10.1017/s136672891200051x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intelligibility of American English vowels of native and non-native speakers in quiet and speech-shaped noise

Abstract: Link to this article: http://journals.cambridge.org/abstract_S136672891200051XHow to cite this article: CHANG LIU and SU-HYUN JIN (2013). Intelligibility of American English vowels of native and non-native speakers in quiet and speech-shaped noise.This study examined intelligibility of twelve American English vowels produced by English, Chinese, and Korean native speakers in quiet and speech-shaped noise in which vowels were presented at six sensation levels from 0 dB to 10 dB. The slopes of vowel intelligibil… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Liu and Jin 9 showed that English vowels spoken by CN and KN speakers had greater variability of F0 contours and higher VISC distances compared to those spoken by EN speakers. Jin et al 10 also found individual vowel categories spoken by KN speakers were more overlapped with each other on a vowel space than those spoken by EN and CN speakers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Liu and Jin 9 showed that English vowels spoken by CN and KN speakers had greater variability of F0 contours and higher VISC distances compared to those spoken by EN speakers. Jin et al 10 also found individual vowel categories spoken by KN speakers were more overlapped with each other on a vowel space than those spoken by EN and CN speakers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7,8 Our recent study suggested that greater temporal dynamics in English vowels (more variability of F0 contours and formant movements) for non-native speakers might result in their lower intelligibility in quiet and noisy conditions than their native peers. 9 However, because this previous study measured the VISC of very few numbers of speakers (e.g., four in each non-native group), their finding was hard to generalize. Thus a main purpose of the current study was to investigate whether there are differences in the VISC of English vowels produced by native and non-native speakers and whether such a) Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The sampling rate of 24,414 Hz was used to be compatible with the hardware of sound processing. The monaural processing was used to be consistent with previous work in our laboratories and to facilitate comparisons with previous findings (Liu & Jin, 2011, 2013; Liu et al, 2012; Mi et al, 2013; Jin & Liu, 2014). Stimulus presentation was controlled by a Tucker-Davis Technologies mobile processor (RM1).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%