2005
DOI: 10.1121/1.2047228
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intelligibilities of 1-octave rectangular bands spanning the speech spectrum when heard separately and paired

Abstract: There is a need, both for speech theory and for many practical applications, to know the intelligibilities of individual passbands that span the speech spectrum when they are heard singly and in combination. While indirect procedures have been employed for estimating passband intelligibilities (e.g., the Speech Intelligibility Index), direct measurements have been blocked by the confounding contributions from transition band slopes that accompany filtering. A recent study has reported that slopes of several th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

7
34
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
7
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One study employed sentences (Warren et al, 2005) and the other employed word lists (Warren et al, 2011). The intelligibilities of these 1-octave pairings in each study were hyperadditive whether the two octave bands were contiguous or separated by 2, 3, or 4 octaves.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One study employed sentences (Warren et al, 2005) and the other employed word lists (Warren et al, 2011). The intelligibilities of these 1-octave pairings in each study were hyperadditive whether the two octave bands were contiguous or separated by 2, 3, or 4 octaves.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two studies determined the intelligibility of the six 1-octave RBs, spanning the speech spectrum from 0.25 to 8 kHz, that were measured both singly and for all 15 possible pairings (Warren et al, 2005(Warren et al, , 2011. One study employed sentences (Warren et al, 2005) and the other employed word lists (Warren et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SII does not explicitly take into account the fact that the information in speech (for example the envelope fluctuations) is correlated across frequency bands: the closer the centre frequencies of the bands, the higher is the correlation (Crouzet & Ainsworth, 2001). Hence the SII does not give accurate predictions of intelligibility for speech that is filtered into very narrow frequency bands whose separation is varied (Warren et al, 2005). Also, the SII does not give accurate predictions of intelligibility for speech in fluctuating background sounds (Rhebergen & Versfeld, 2005).…”
Section: Effects On Speech Intelligibility Expected From the Speech Imentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Oxenham and Simonson hypothesized that this decrease in benefit was due to reduced redundancy within the target speech signal. Natural speech is highly redundant, a feature that normal-hearing listeners are able to exploit when provided with temporally or spectrally degraded signals (Warren et al, 1995;Warren et al, 2005;Wang and Humes, 2010). Reducing that redundancy, by virtue of filtering the target, could reduce the quality of glimpses available in the masker modulation minima.…”
Section: A Effects Of Phonetic/linguistic Redundancymentioning
confidence: 99%