2017
DOI: 10.1007/978-981-10-6916-1_17
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intelligent Twitter Spam Detection: A Hybrid Approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Vishwarupe et al [38] developed an intelligent system for spam detection: it provided a description about spam profiles after the detection process had completed. This system was tested on twitter OSN.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vishwarupe et al [38] developed an intelligent system for spam detection: it provided a description about spam profiles after the detection process had completed. This system was tested on twitter OSN.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vishwarupe et al 26 introduced an Intelligent Twitter spam detection system that investigated spam accounts precisely by diagnosing Twitter spam. This hybrid method applied a set of unique features, Twitter 4j API, and Google Safe Browsing API.…”
Section: Background and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In literature works, one work, 21 has investigated ROC (AUC) similarly to our paper to identify the models' predictive ability in discriminating between spam and non‐spam tweets. Most papers 1,10,15,17,20,22,23,25–27 have evaluated a few number of parameters, while very few papers have examined imbalanced datasets, or in case of studying imbalanced data, the spam detection rate in their methods is still very low 10,12,17,21 . To best of our knowledge, no paper employs evolutionary algorithms for hyperparameters to enhance the detection rate; one work 30 has combined WOA with SSA to select an optimum subset of features, and one work 17 has applied DT, PSO, and genetic algorithms, no paper has used DE algorithm to improve the spam detection rate in Twitter dataset.…”
Section: Background and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Liu et al [31] employed user behavior information, online social network attributes, and text content characteristics as features for spammer detection. Vishwarupe et al [32] used the type of account as a feature, i.e., they checked whether the account was verified.…”
Section: A Spammer Detection Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%