2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.apacoust.2012.04.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intelligent systems approaches to product sound quality evaluations – A review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The shock absorber is bad and should not be applied to mass-produced cars 1 The noise has serious S&R that can be perceived by all passengers…”
Section: Jury Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The shock absorber is bad and should not be applied to mass-produced cars 1 The noise has serious S&R that can be perceived by all passengers…”
Section: Jury Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, much effort is invested in improving car riding comfort and interior sound quality [1]. However, as the main sound and vibration sources have been increasingly well controlled, other types of noise from previously ignored components, such as gear noise [2], heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) noise [3], and wiper noise [4], have become prevalent.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sharpness represents the auditory characteristic involving the high-frequency portion of sound [8]. Generally, the higher the sharpness value, the harsher the sound.…”
Section: Sharpnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many other studies have sought to determine the relationship between automotive S&R and sound quality [3]. Although vehicle interior noise indices have been widely developed [1,8], few investigations have focused on a complete vehicle road test of the sound quality of the suspension shock absorber rattling noise.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A product sound can be generated from physical factors that are transmitted to psychoacoustic factors, which induce psychological reactions in customers and influence their attitudes and behaviors, such as a preference for industrial products (Özcan & Schifferstein, ; Petiot, Kristensen, & Maier, ; Pietila & Lim, ; Västfjäll, Gulbol, Kleiner, & Gärling, ), food‐related behaviors (Elder & Mohr, ; Spence & Shankar, ; Zampini & Spence, ), and brand‐image enhancement (Fastl, ; Flath & Klein, ; Lyon, ). Companies have attempted to develop appropriate sounds to improve the affective reactions of customers, which refers to people's feelings and emotional responses to the sound.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%