2016
DOI: 10.1007/s11036-016-0682-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intelligent Sensing for Citizen Science

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Specifically, there is an acute shortage of streamflow data in headwater catchments (Kirchner, 2006) and developing regions (Mulligan, 2013). This data gap is perpetuated by a lack of understanding among policy makers and citizens alike regarding the importance of streamflow data, which leads to persistent funding challenges (Kundzewicz, 1997;Pearson, 1998). This is further compounded by the reality that the hydrological sciences research community has focused much of its efforts in recent decades on advancing modeling techniques, while innovation in methods for generating the data these models depend on has been relegated to a lower priority (Mishra and Coulibaly, 2009;Burt and Mc-Donnell, 2015), even though these data form the foundation of hydrology (Tetzlaff et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Specifically, there is an acute shortage of streamflow data in headwater catchments (Kirchner, 2006) and developing regions (Mulligan, 2013). This data gap is perpetuated by a lack of understanding among policy makers and citizens alike regarding the importance of streamflow data, which leads to persistent funding challenges (Kundzewicz, 1997;Pearson, 1998). This is further compounded by the reality that the hydrological sciences research community has focused much of its efforts in recent decades on advancing modeling techniques, while innovation in methods for generating the data these models depend on has been relegated to a lower priority (Mishra and Coulibaly, 2009;Burt and Mc-Donnell, 2015), even though these data form the foundation of hydrology (Tetzlaff et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the previously referenced studies focus mainly on involving citizen scientists for observing stream levels, we were primarily concerned with the possibility of enabling citizen scientists to take direct measurements of streamflow. Using keyword searches with combinations of "citizen science", "citizen hydrology", "community monitoring", "streamflow monitoring", "streamflow measurements", "smartphone streamflow measurement", and "discharge measurements", we found that research on using smartphone video processing methods for streamflow measurement has been ongoing for nearly 5 years (Lüthi et al, 2014;Peña-Haro et al, 2018). Despite the promising nature of these technologies, we could not find any specific studies evaluating the strengths and weaknesses of citizen scientists applying these technologies directly in the field themselves.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, the course attendants were asked to develop a citizen science mobile app by themselves. In this vein, smartphones enable to automate data collection and enrich observations with photographs, sound recordings and global positioning system (GPS) coordinates using embedded sensors [49]. The app requirements were: (i) to simulate the input of a numerical measurement of an external phenomenon and (ii) to compute the average of the collected measurements, excluding values out of a permitted value range.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…54,55 Additionally, it has been used as a framework for citizen sensing, leveraging the ubiquity of modern smartphones and wearables to provide detailed observations of remote physical locations. 56 The third evaluation focus is on code quality metrics and user evaluations. 41 The static analysis of the code base yielded favorable results when compared to that of two similar middleware offerings, ie, GSN 51 and WSNWare.…”
Section: Evaluation and Future Workmentioning
confidence: 99%