The 40th International Conference on Computers &Amp; Indutrial Engineering 2010
DOI: 10.1109/iccie.2010.5668378
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intelligent monitoring and detection of chatter in ball-end milling process on CNC machining center

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The axial force (F z ) is typically much smaller than F x (cutting feed force) and F y (radial cutting force), so it does not contribute to the chatter (Sutherland, 1987). Pongsathornwiwat and Tangjitsitcharoen (2010) found that the force along the cutting feed (F x ) is larger than the cutting force along the radial depth of cut direction (F y ), which is experimentally validated by authors. Due to larger cutting force along the cutting feed, the amplitude of vibration along cutting feed is considered for analysis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…The axial force (F z ) is typically much smaller than F x (cutting feed force) and F y (radial cutting force), so it does not contribute to the chatter (Sutherland, 1987). Pongsathornwiwat and Tangjitsitcharoen (2010) found that the force along the cutting feed (F x ) is larger than the cutting force along the radial depth of cut direction (F y ), which is experimentally validated by authors. Due to larger cutting force along the cutting feed, the amplitude of vibration along cutting feed is considered for analysis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…The results showed that at chatter, the maximum value of cutting forces increased by at least 60% and its standard variation by about 80%. Wei et al [114] utilized only the signal in the vertical direction (Z), while Tangjitsitcharoen and Pongsathornwiwat [74,226] registered the three axes and calculated the average variance of each axis and the normalized ratio of these variances (X/Y, X/Z and Y/Z) in a 1-s frame. In chatter condition, these ratios increased for two different cutter types, flat and ball nose end mills.…”
Section: Dynamometer-cutting Forcesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[34] that the cutting force approaches a Gaussian distribution when chatter occurs is questionable. Furthermore, most time series analysis methods [28,29,31,32,[34][35][36][37]39,40] cannot identify the chatter frequency. [35] is computationally very efficient but sensitive to the measurement errors and various transient events in the cutting process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%