2022
DOI: 10.1109/tii.2021.3102017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intelligent Mechanical Fault Diagnosis Using Multisensor Fusion and Convolution Neural Network

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 124 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After the model training at different conditions is completed, a five-fold cross-validation method is adopted to obtain the classification accuracy of the trained model. The classification accuracy [ 37 ] is defined as where, TP , TN , FP , and FN represent the number of true positives, true negatives, false positives, and false negatives, respectively. The results of the confusion matrix and the classification accuracy are shown in Figure 17 and Table 6 , respectively.…”
Section: Fault Diagnosis Of Bearing Abnormal Wearmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After the model training at different conditions is completed, a five-fold cross-validation method is adopted to obtain the classification accuracy of the trained model. The classification accuracy [ 37 ] is defined as where, TP , TN , FP , and FN represent the number of true positives, true negatives, false positives, and false negatives, respectively. The results of the confusion matrix and the classification accuracy are shown in Figure 17 and Table 6 , respectively.…”
Section: Fault Diagnosis Of Bearing Abnormal Wearmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For processing sensor data for real-time diagnostics redundancy, numerous parameters have to be analyzed [ 38 ]. To develop predictive models for machines, data collection of the mechanical health condition is needed [ 73 , 74 ]. In AM, sensors are attached to measure and detect thermal, acoustic, optical, and ultrasonic signals, which return valuable information [ 5 ].…”
Section: Additive Manufacturing and Data-driven Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1) Pre-processing methods: Fig. 5 shows the comparison results across four data pre-processing methods: (a) convert the raw signal into two-dimensional time-frequency domain signal through Short-time Fourier transform (STFT); (b) reshape the frequency domain signal processed by fast Fourier transform into a 32x64 matrix (denoted as RI), and a similar trick can be found [38]; (c) reshape the frequency domain signal into a 64x32 matrix (denoted as RII); and (d) normalize the twodimensional matrix generated by RI (denoted as Norm). It can be seen that STFT is inferior to the other three methods.…”
Section: Sensitivity Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%