2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2017.05.067
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intelligent management of coal stockpiles using improved grey spontaneous combustion forecasting models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, we proposed a novel improved GM(1,1) model, DCOGM(1,1), for electricity consumption prediction. To evaluate the simulation and prediction performance of DCOGM(1,1), some compared prediction models, such as statistical analysis models (LR model and MAED [57]), computational intelligence models (BPN, RBFN and SVR), and grey prediction models (AGM(1,1) model [56], GPRM [58], NNGM(1,1) [6], DGM(1,1) [51], FGM(1,1) [50], RGM(1,1) [59], and TGM(1,1) [54]), are selected in this article. From Case 1 and Case2, we can see that the grey prediction models outperform statistical analysis models and computational intelligence models, that is the MAPEs gained by AGM(1,1) and DCOGM(1,1) are lower than those by BPN and SVR in Case 1 as shown in Table 1 and the MAPEs gained by MAED, BPN and RBFN are higher than those by GPRM, NNGM(1,1) and DCOGM(1,1) in Case 2 as indicated in Table 2.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In this study, we proposed a novel improved GM(1,1) model, DCOGM(1,1), for electricity consumption prediction. To evaluate the simulation and prediction performance of DCOGM(1,1), some compared prediction models, such as statistical analysis models (LR model and MAED [57]), computational intelligence models (BPN, RBFN and SVR), and grey prediction models (AGM(1,1) model [56], GPRM [58], NNGM(1,1) [6], DGM(1,1) [51], FGM(1,1) [50], RGM(1,1) [59], and TGM(1,1) [54]), are selected in this article. From Case 1 and Case2, we can see that the grey prediction models outperform statistical analysis models and computational intelligence models, that is the MAPEs gained by AGM(1,1) and DCOGM(1,1) are lower than those by BPN and SVR in Case 1 as shown in Table 1 and the MAPEs gained by MAED, BPN and RBFN are higher than those by GPRM, NNGM(1,1) and DCOGM(1,1) in Case 2 as indicated in Table 2.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, in this paper, we optimized the GM(1,1) model by combining data transformation for the original data sequence and combination interpolation optimization of the background value, namely DCOGM(1,1). The results of three cases suggest that the prediction performance of DCOGM(1,1) is not only better than statistical analysis models and computational intelligence models, but also better than other grey modification models, such as AGM(1,1) model [56], GPRM [58], NNGM(1,1) [6], DGM(1,1) [51], FGM(1,1) [50], RGM(1,1) [59] and TGM(1,1) [54]. Thus, DCOGM(1,1) is a promising tool for short-term electricity consumption prediction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Wang et al (2014) reported that applying polyethylene glycol (PEG) decreases the concentrations of readily oxidized functional groups on coal surfaces. 13,14 2 | EXPERIMENTAL 10 Moreover, Shi et al (2005) used layered double hydroxides (LDHs) as a flame retardant to interrupt the combustion diffusion by changing the material surface structure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, we established a feasible control mechanism for attenuating both coal mine accidents and environmental pollution. 13,14 2 | EXPERIMENTAL…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%