2019
DOI: 10.1109/access.2019.2927412
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intelligent Intersection Management Systems Considering Autonomous Vehicles: A Systematic Literature Review

Abstract: Over the past several decades, the development of technologies and the production of autonomous vehicles have enhanced the need for intelligent intersection management systems. Subsequently, growing interest in studying the traffic management of autonomous vehicles at intersections has been evident, which indicates a critical need to conduct a systematic literature review on this topic. This paper offers a systematic review of the proposed methodologies for intelligent intersection management systems and prese… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
47
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 111 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 138 publications
(218 reference statements)
0
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Currently, few works are based on machine learning approaches (4%). Namazi et al (2019) also explain that the vast majority (93%) of the articles reviewed consider a CAVs penetration rate of 100%. To be more realistic, autonomous intersections should be compliant with mixed traffic (CAVs and conventional HVs), pedestrians, and cyclists.…”
Section: Cooperative Intersection Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Currently, few works are based on machine learning approaches (4%). Namazi et al (2019) also explain that the vast majority (93%) of the articles reviewed consider a CAVs penetration rate of 100%. To be more realistic, autonomous intersections should be compliant with mixed traffic (CAVs and conventional HVs), pedestrians, and cyclists.…”
Section: Cooperative Intersection Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8, of such an autonomous intersection, in which vehicles negotiate the "right of way" using V2V communication. More generally, a systematic literature review of intelligent intersection management systems for CAVs is proposed by Namazi et al (2019). The authors indicate that some works on this topic consider rule-based methodologies (40%), while others consider optimization methodologies (45%), and hybrid methodologies (11%).…”
Section: Cooperative Intersection Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The literature on intelligent intersection management is extensive. A recent literature review on the subject [1] classifies "safety" as one of five subcategories or subgoals within this literature. In addition, within studies on "safety", there are also two main directions: "collision avoidance" [2] and "resolving conflict" [3], [4].…”
Section: A Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, rule-based solutions do not easily adapt to different scenarios, while optimization-based methods may rapidly converge to local minimal solutions and hence, have relatively low computational efficiency. In addition, a study by Namazi et al [34] shows that traditional machine learning-based solutions are not suitable for a complex and dynamic environment such as autonomous driving. Leveraging deep learning especially the Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs), Lv et al [35] handled collision avoidance by predicting the traffic flow while Chen et al [10] utilized DRL with multi-agents settings to avoid collisions.…”
Section: A Collision Avoidancementioning
confidence: 99%