Intelligent Framework for Enhancing the Quality of Online Exams based on Students’ Personalization

Abstract

In education sector, personalization is an evolutionary term that gained a high attention due to its effectiveness in raising the enterprise competence level. This research aims at proposing a novel model for effective smart testing, which considers the student's Facebook activities in determining the students' personality and constructing his suitable exam. The aim of this examination perspectives to ensure the reliable student evaluation according to his gained knowledge to ensure that no other factor interferes which may negatively affect the reliable evaluation. The research also applies text analytics techniques to ensure the exam balance. The proposed model has been applied and evaluated with professors' percentage equal to 96.5 % and successfully reach students satisfaction percentage with average equal to 96.63%.

A Smart Testing Model Based on Mining Semantic Relations

“…Although some researchers discussed the same direction, however, different approaches were followed. In [53], students' personalities were detected by the students' social media data, however, in the current research. A more direct methodology was adopted by offering the questionnaire.…”

“…A more direct methodology was adopted by offering the questionnaire. The research in [53] had successful percentages, however, following the current proposed approach for identifying the questions and formulating the exam, the current research reached a more uniform curve as illustrated in figures I and II which reveals more accurate results and more unbiased questions for the students. Another research in [7] also considered the same perspective of conducting a questionnaire for determining the students' preferences, however, the exam was set manually with no intelligent approach to construct which also provides an advancement of the current proposed approach.…”

“…The online education process has been tackled by many researchers such as in [17] [18] [19]. The research in [20] focused on the operating learning process and proposed that the student's activities have performed during the ongoing process.…”