2020
DOI: 10.1109/access.2020.2976868
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intelligent Fault Identification for Rolling Element Bearings in Impulsive Noise Environments Based on Cyclic Correntropy Spectra and LSSVM

Abstract: Rolling element bearings are important components in various types of industrial equipment. It is necessary to develop advanced fault diagnosis techniques to prevent unexpected accidents caused by bearing failures. However, impulsive background noise in industrial fields also presents a similar fault-excited characteristic, which brings interference to the fault diagnosis of rolling element bearings. Focusing on this issue, this paper proposes a new feature extraction method based on the cyclic correntropy spe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The classical machine learning algorithms: BP, DT, SVM and LSSVM, the intelligent optimization algorithms improved Y NL and NS [189] Y Small-sample, NL [190] Y NL and NS, impulsive noise [191] Y NL and NS [192] -Big data, quantum Intelligent optimization algorithms-SVM [194] Improve SVM parameters Slow optimization speed, many adjustment parameters -Mixed noise [195] Y Complex imbalanced data [196] Y NL and NS [197] -Multi-channel signals [199] Y EFS [200] Y NL and NS [201] Y SVM and the deep learning algorithms: CNN and LSTM are compared from the key features, application difficulties and application occasions (table 3). By combing and comparing the common methods of fault feature identification, the classical machine learning algorithms and deep learning algorithms can achieve better application results in different occasions.…”
Section: Comparative Analysis Of Fault Feature Identification Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The classical machine learning algorithms: BP, DT, SVM and LSSVM, the intelligent optimization algorithms improved Y NL and NS [189] Y Small-sample, NL [190] Y NL and NS, impulsive noise [191] Y NL and NS [192] -Big data, quantum Intelligent optimization algorithms-SVM [194] Improve SVM parameters Slow optimization speed, many adjustment parameters -Mixed noise [195] Y Complex imbalanced data [196] Y NL and NS [197] -Multi-channel signals [199] Y EFS [200] Y NL and NS [201] Y SVM and the deep learning algorithms: CNN and LSTM are compared from the key features, application difficulties and application occasions (table 3). By combing and comparing the common methods of fault feature identification, the classical machine learning algorithms and deep learning algorithms can achieve better application results in different occasions.…”
Section: Comparative Analysis Of Fault Feature Identification Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Li et al [189] proposed a fault diagnosis method based on deep structure and sparse LSSVM, which combined LSSVM with sparse theory and effectively solved the insufficient sparsity problem of LSSVM. Zhao et al [190] proposed a fault diagnosis method based on cyclic correntropy spectrum and LSSVM, which had stable adaptive ability. Jiao et al [191] compared LSSVM with radial basis function neural network and probabilistic neural network, indicating that LSSVM had better generalization performance in bearing fault classification.…”
Section: Fault Feature Identification Based On Classical Machine Lear...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rotating machinery environments are severe and involve many reasons for failures. Sensors are used to collect the data from the rotating machinery; signal processing methods are deployed to remove the noise; and deep learning methods are applied as prognostics to assess the rotating machinery for prognostics and health management (PHM) [ 1 , 2 , 3 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gao et al [ 30 ] fused singular entropy, energy entropy, and permutation entropy to obtain complementary features, combined with the PSO algorithm to optimize LSSVM, and successfully completed the diagnosis of bearing faults. Zhao et al [ 31 ] extracted narrowband kurtosis vectors from the cyclic correntropy spectrum (CCES) as feature vectors of LSSVM for the early detection and classification of locomotive axle bearing faults. Zhu et al [ 32 ] used VMD to decompose the bearing vibration signal, used the fuzzy entropy of each IMF as the feature vector, optimized the LSSVM model by the gray wolf optimizer (GWO) algorithm, and finally completed the identification of the rolling bearing faults.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%