2022
DOI: 10.1109/tase.2020.3048056
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intelligent Fault Diagnosis for Large-Scale Rotating Machines Using Binarized Deep Neural Networks and Random Forests

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To verify the effectiveness of the method in this paper, two classic methods (SVM [ 41 ] and DBN [ 42 ]) and three latest methods (SPBO-SDAE [ 11 ], PSO-DNN [ 12 ] and CS-IMSNs [ 13 ]) were selected for comparison. The brief settings of these fault diagnosis methods are listed in Table 5 .…”
Section: Experimental Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To verify the effectiveness of the method in this paper, two classic methods (SVM [ 41 ] and DBN [ 42 ]) and three latest methods (SPBO-SDAE [ 11 ], PSO-DNN [ 12 ] and CS-IMSNs [ 13 ]) were selected for comparison. The brief settings of these fault diagnosis methods are listed in Table 5 .…”
Section: Experimental Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fault classification refers to predicting the fault category of unknown signals by learning data features. The research on fault classification optimization is relatively mature and includes the latest algorithms: ANN [ 10 ], SPBO-SDAE [ 11 ], PSO-DNN [ 12 ] and CS-IMSNs [ 13 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(5.) MHMM [11] Modified HMM for TWM --Online MoG-HMM [12] Learns RUL distributions with MoG-HMM --HMM and NF [13] Predicts degradation with Neuro-Fuzzy ----HSMM [14] Uses HSMM to predict RUL ---HMM for TWM [15] Uses HMM to predict RUL ---HMM ensemble [16] HMM ensemble to predict RUL --Neo Fuzzy [17] Predicts RMS with Neuro-Fuzzy -----FDFDA [18] FD analysis and regression updating ---ANN for TWM [19] Convolutional ANN for wear classification -----RNN with HI [20] RNN for HI and RUL estimation ----Fault effects [21] Uses fault effects to predict RUL ---LSTM-SVM [22] LSTM-SVM for RUL prediction ---LSTM with PF [23] Uses LSTM networks and PF to predict RUL ---BDNN-RF [24] BDNN and RF for ball-bearing fault prediction ----Regression [25] Regression models for RUL estimation --EKM for TWM [26] EKF and regression to predict RUL --WPD-HMM [27] Log-likelihood of HMM as HI --AHMM [28] Adaptive HMM for TWM -Trigger regression [29] Triggered regression for RUL estimation -APCMD [30] Local and global regressions to predict RUL -HSIC [31] Changes in dependencies as degradation --Random Forest [32] Uses random forest to detect anomalies ---Genetic HMMs [33] Learns HMMs with genetic algorithms --AMBi-GAN [34] Uses GAN to detect anomalies --…”
Section: Papermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Harutyunyan et al [10] developed a fault detection method based on multi-level model by using the hierarchical structure of detection and diagnosis methods. Li et al [11] proposed a new fault diagnosis model which combined binarized deep neural network with improved random forests for real-time fault diagnosis. Lu et al [12] presented an innovative diagnosis model using the complementary ensemble empirical mode decomposition with kernel support vector machines to evaluate the health condition of bearings in terms of defect severity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%