2020 3rd International Conference on Hot Information-Centric Networking (HotICN) 2020
DOI: 10.1109/hoticn50779.2020.9350853
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intelligent Eco Networking (IEN) III: A Shared In-network Computing Infrastructure towards Future Internet

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because the metaverse is expected to provide an immersion experience to a large group of simultaneous users [13], optimal computing resource allocation is critical to resolving the resource demand conflict among simultaneous users. The COIN paradigm is a promising solution that leverages unused network resources to perform tasks, reducing delay and meeting QoE requirements [9,10]. However, adding computing resources or enabling COIN increases power consumption.…”
Section: B Motivation and Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Because the metaverse is expected to provide an immersion experience to a large group of simultaneous users [13], optimal computing resource allocation is critical to resolving the resource demand conflict among simultaneous users. The COIN paradigm is a promising solution that leverages unused network resources to perform tasks, reducing delay and meeting QoE requirements [9,10]. However, adding computing resources or enabling COIN increases power consumption.…”
Section: B Motivation and Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although mobile edge computing (MEC) offers a solution through remote task offloading (TO), it cannot simultaneously support massive user demand [5][6][7][8]. The computing in the network (COIN) paradigm is a promising solution that leverages unused network resources to perform tasks, reducing delay and satisfying the quality of experience (QoE) requirements [9][10][11]. However, adding computing resources or enabling COIN increases power consumption.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For data-intensive tasks, input size 𝐼 𝑓 and software volume 𝑉 𝑓 of the four subtasks are uniformly and randomly generated from { [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] MB, [0.5-2] GB}, respectively. The required CPU cycles 𝑃 𝑓 for each data-intensive subtask were randomly chosen from { [1][2][3][4] gigacycles}. In the compute-intensive task type, 𝐼 𝑓 and 𝑉 𝑓 were generated uniformly and randomly from { [1][2][3][4] MB, [0.5-2] GB}, respectively, with corresponding 𝑃 𝑓 randomly selected from { [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] gigacycles}.Some slight adjustments to the ranges of randomly generated values were made to accommodate variations in subtask sizes.…”
Section: B Influence Of Experimental Parameters On the System Model 1...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As such, the computing-power network rises in response to the proper time and conditions for ubiquitous AI. It aims to connect the resources between clouds, edges, and ends through the network, to provide more flexible high-quality AI services while breaking down the island and monopoly of resources [249], [250].…”
Section: A Comprehensive Architecturementioning
confidence: 99%