2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemolab.2018.09.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intelligent computational method for discrimination of anticancer peptides by incorporating sequential and evolutionary profiles information

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, many sequence-based computational methods, for example, AntiCP [23], Hajisharifi et al’s method [24], ACPP [25], iACP [26], Li and Wang’s method [27], iACP-GAEnsC [28], MLACP [29], SAP [30] and TargetACP [31], have been developed using a wide range of machine learning methods and peptide features as summarized in Table 1. In 2014, Hajisharifi et al [24] established a benchmark dataset spanning 138 experimentally confirmed ACPs (positive dataset) and 227 non-AMPs (negative dataset).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recently, many sequence-based computational methods, for example, AntiCP [23], Hajisharifi et al’s method [24], ACPP [25], iACP [26], Li and Wang’s method [27], iACP-GAEnsC [28], MLACP [29], SAP [30] and TargetACP [31], have been developed using a wide range of machine learning methods and peptide features as summarized in Table 1. In 2014, Hajisharifi et al [24] established a benchmark dataset spanning 138 experimentally confirmed ACPs (positive dataset) and 227 non-AMPs (negative dataset).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method yielded better prediction accuracy (95.06%) than the two previous methods [23,24]. Thusfar, state-of-the-art ACP predictors includes iACP-GAEnsC [28] and TargetACP [31] in which both afforded high prediction accuracies of 96.45% and 98.78%, respectively. The iACP-GAEnsC [28] method follows the concept of evolutionary intelligent genetic algorithm-based ensemble model for improving the true classification rate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, the ensemble learning approach using a genetic algorithm was applied by combining the prediction rates of the five individual classifiers and reported high accuracy of 96.45%. Furthermore, Kabir et al proposed a "TargetACP" model using the HC dataset, that extracts sequential and evolutionary descriptors from peptide sequences [18]. Besides, an oversampling method was also applied to reduce the biases of the majority class.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the same time Kabir et al, proposed TargetACP, where the peptides were represented using split AAC, correlation factors extracted from PSSM profiles (PsePSSM), and composite protein sequence representation (CPSR). They also used SVM, RF and KNN classifiers as their employed models [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ACP-DL extracts features from two one-hot vector-based peptide representation techniques (binary profile and k-mer sparse matrix) that only depict the presence of a specific amino acid or a group of amino acids along different positions of the sequences. As a result, physicochemical properties or evolutionary substitution information of the residues, which contain significant signals regarding anticancer activities of peptide sequences are not utilized in ACP-DL's feature extraction process [3,14,11,13]. As a result, although the predictive performance of ACP-DL is quite impressive, there is still room for significant improvement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%