2006
DOI: 10.1007/s10887-006-7407-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intelligence, Human Capital, and Economic Growth: A Bayesian Averaging of Classical Estimates (BACE) Approach

Abstract: Human capital plays an important role in the theory of economic growth, but it has been difficult to measure this abstract concept. We survey the psychological literature on cross-cultural IQ tests and conclude that intelligence tests provide one useful measure of human capital. Using a new database of national average IQ, we show that in growth regressions that include only robust control variables, IQ is statistically significant in 99.8% of these 1330 regressions, easily passing a Bayesian model-averaging r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
33
0
3

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 187 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(29 reference statements)
2
33
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…They conclude that national IQ levels seem to be an excellent measure for human capital resources, since it performs much better than, for example, school enrollment variables. This point is also confirmed by Jones and Schneider (2006), who find it to be the most robust variable to measure human capital. 9 More recently, Hanushek and Woessmann (2008) as well as Rindermann and Thomson (2011) assess the roles of cognitive skills, or cognitive competences on economic growth and institutions.…”
Section: Growth Analysissupporting
confidence: 58%
“…They conclude that national IQ levels seem to be an excellent measure for human capital resources, since it performs much better than, for example, school enrollment variables. This point is also confirmed by Jones and Schneider (2006), who find it to be the most robust variable to measure human capital. 9 More recently, Hanushek and Woessmann (2008) as well as Rindermann and Thomson (2011) assess the roles of cognitive skills, or cognitive competences on economic growth and institutions.…”
Section: Growth Analysissupporting
confidence: 58%
“…Based on these findings, they maintained that "national IQ explains a significant part of the variations in various measures of human conditions" (Lynn & Vanhanen, 2006: 291). Lynn and Vahnanen's results have been confirmed and extended by numerous studies, mainly by psychologists (for a review: Lynn & Vanhanen, 2012a,b), but also by some economists (Jones & Schneider, 2006;Ram, 2007;Weede & Kampf, 2002). Significant relationships between IQ and socio-economic development levels, measured by GDP per capita and other indicators, have also been found at national and regional levels, for the British Isles (Lynn, 1979), the United States (Kanazawa, 2006a;McDaniel, 2006) Italy (Lynn, 2010a,b;Templer, 2012), Japan (Kura, 2013) and Finland (Dutton & Lynn, 2014).…”
Section: Genes Iq and Economic Developmentmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…Of note, a high level of caffeine intake was associated with a two-fold risk of borderline or low intellectual functioning, which is of clinical significance. These differences are potentially relevant from a public health viewpoint since even small variations in population-level IQ scores, although of little clinical significance for the individual, may have measurable effects on human capital (28).…”
Section: Principal Findings Of the Studymentioning
confidence: 99%